# A Comprehensive Objective Evaluation of Modern Text-to-Speech for Turkish Using Speech Quality Assessment Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06057 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.06057/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Conditional Variational Autoencoder with Adversarial Learning for End-to-End Text-to-Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06103/) (2021)
- [UTMOS: UTokyo-SaruLab System for VoiceMOS Challenge 2022](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02152/) (2022)
- [YourTTS: Towards Zero-Shot Multi-Speaker TTS and Zero-Shot Voice Conversion for everyone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02418/) (2021)
- [DNSMOS: A Non-Intrusive Perceptual Objective Speech Quality metric to evaluate Noise Suppressors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.15258/) (2020)
- [NaturalSpeech 2: Latent Diffusion Models are Natural and Zero-Shot Speech and Singing Synthesizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09116/) (2023)
- [XTTS: a Massively Multilingual Zero-Shot Text-to-Speech Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04904/) (2024)
- [Speak Foreign Languages with Your Own Voice: Cross-Lingual Neural Codec Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03926/) (2023)
- [CosyVoice 3: Towards In-the-wild Speech Generation via Scaling-up and Post-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17589/) (2025)
- [Meta Audiobox Aesthetics: Unified Automatic Quality Assessment for Speech, Music, and Sound](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05139/) (2025)
- [The T05 System for The VoiceMOS Challenge 2024: Transfer Learning from Deep Image Classifier to Naturalness MOS Prediction of High-Quality Synthetic Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09305/) (2024)
- [TorchAudio-Squim: Reference-less Speech Quality and Intelligibility measures in TorchAudio](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01448/) (2023)
- [OmniVoice: Towards Omnilingual Zero-Shot Text-to-Speech with Diffusion Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00688/) (2026)
- [SCOREQ: Speech Quality Assessment with Contrastive Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06675/) (2024)
- [Brouhaha: multi-task training for voice activity detection, speech-to-noise ratio, and C50 room acoustics estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13248/) (2022)
- [SpeechLMScore: Evaluating speech generation using speech language model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04559/) (2022)
- [VoxCPM2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06928/) (2026)
- [MOS-Bench: Benchmarking Generalization Abilities of Subjective Speech Quality Assessment Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03715/) (2024)
- [TTSDS2: Resources and Benchmark for Evaluating Human-Quality Text to Speech Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19441/) (2025)
- [From Scores to Preferences: Redefining MOS Benchmarking for Speech Quality Reward Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00743/) (2025)
- [UrgentMOS: Unified Multi-Metric and Preference Learning for Robust Speech Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18438/) (2026)
- [WhiSQA: Non-Intrusive Speech Quality Prediction Using Whisper Encoder Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02210/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Modern text-to-speech (TTS) systems can clone a target speaker from a short reference clip or be fine-tuned on a target voice, yet their behaviour on morphologically rich, lower-resource languages such as Turkish remain under-characterised. We present a systematic benchmark of four contemporary systems (Chatterbox, CosyVoice, OmniVoice, and VoxCPM2) evaluated across fine-tuned and zero-shot configurations, contrasted with a conventional VITS baseline and anchored to natural gold speech. Each configuration is scored with eighteen complementary objective metrics spanning learned naturalness predictors (UTMOS v2, DNSMOS-Pro, SCOREQ, WhisQA, AudioBox-PQ, NatScore, SpeechLMScore), intelligibility and signal-quality estimators (SQUIM PESQ/SI-SDR/STOI, Brouhaha), speaker similarity, distributional fidelity (TTSDS) and low-level acoustic descriptors. We further analyse how quality varies with utterance length and quantify long-form temporal consistency through speaker-identity and naturalness drift over chunked utterances. We release our evaluation code to support reproducible TTS evaluation.