# Dataset Signatures in Human-LLM Interactions and User Modeling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05534 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05534/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 40 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10957/) (2020)
- [DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09543/) (2021)
- [Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.01759/) (2016)
- [Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02324/) (2018)
- [WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01470/) (2024)
- [Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13663/) (2024)
- [Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08758/) (2021)
- [LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11998/) (2023)
- [LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06120/) (2025)
- [Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03169/) (2023)
- [The Pushshift Reddit Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08435/) (2020)
- [A Survey on Data Selection for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16827/) (2024)
- [WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04770/) (2024)
- [The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16019/) (2024)
- [Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04761/) (2025)
- [Parallelizing the dual revised simplex method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.01889/) (2015)
- [A Deeper Look at Dataset Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.01257/) (2015)
- [Flipping the Dialogue: Training and Evaluating User Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06552/) (2025)
- [A Decade's Battle on Dataset Bias: Are We There Yet?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08632/) (2024)
- [Trust No Bot: Discovering Personal Disclosures in Human-LLM Conversations in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11438/) (2024)
- [Know You First and Be You Better: Modeling Human-Like User Simulators via Implicit Profiles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18968/) (2025)
- [HumanLM: Simulating Users with State Alignment Beats Response Imitation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03303/) (2026)
- [ChatBench: From Static Benchmarks to Human-AI Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07114/) (2025)
- [PlatoLM: Teaching LLMs in Multi-Round Dialogue via a User Simulator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11534/) (2023)
- [Navigating Rifts in Human-LLM Grounding: Study and Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13975/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Human--LLM interaction datasets shape our understanding of AI use and provide a foundation for downstream research, including training and evaluation of user models. In recent years, a growing number of datasets have sought to capture a representative picture of human--LLM interactions. But how different are the pictures these datasets provide, and what do those differences mean for research built on them? We study these questions across seven conversation datasets, spanning in-the-wild chat logs and human preference data. We begin by revisiting the dataset classification experiment of Torralba & Efros and find that neural network classifiers identify the source of a conversation from user messages alone well above chance, indicating distinctive dataset signatures. This separability persists after matching datasets on the dimensions of human-designed taxonomies, implying subtle differences that these taxonomies do not capture. We then examine the implications for user modeling: how dataset signatures propagate to the outputs of user models trained on these datasets; how dataset choice influences evaluations of user model quality and subsequent evaluations of LLM assistants paired with these user models; and how dataset classifiers can guide data selection for training user models. While each dataset is meant to capture a slice of 'real-world' interactions, our findings reveal the extent to which these slices diverge, and the consequences of those differences for research built on these foundations.