# EmoRSS: Mitigating Emotion-Induced Over-Refusal in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04998 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04998/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 25 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/safety-alignment-and-jailbreak-attacks/)
- LLM safety and security / [Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails](https://mlsanity.com/safety/safety-alignment-refusal-and-guardrails/)
- Mechanistic interpretability / [Steering and probing for LLM safety](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/steering-and-probing-for-llm-safety/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04249/) (2024)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11717/) (2024)
- [BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04657/) (2023)
- [How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06373/) (2024)
- [JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01318/) (2024)
- [XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01263/) (2023)
- [OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20947/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Understand and Can be Enhanced by Emotional Stimuli](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11760/) (2023)
- [Emotion Concepts and their Function in a Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07729/) (2026)
- [SCANS: Mitigating the Exaggerated Safety for LLMs via Safety-Conscious Activation Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11491/) (2024)
- [Navigating the OverKill in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.17633/) (2024)
- [Just Enough Shifts: Mitigating Over-Refusal in Aligned Language Models with Targeted Representation Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04250/) (2025)
- [LLM-Assisted Crisis Management: Building Advanced LLM Platforms for Effective Emergency Response and Public Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10908/) (2024)
- [Understanding and Mitigating Overrefusal in LLMs from an Unveiling Perspective of Safety Decision Boundary](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18325/) (2025)
- [Valence-Arousal Subspace in LLMs: Circular Emotion Geometry and Multi-Behavioral Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03147/) (2026)
- [Mitigating Exaggerated Safety in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05418/) (2024)
- [What Matters For Safety Alignment?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03868/) (2026)
- [Deactivating Refusal Triggers: Understanding and Mitigating Overrefusal in Safety Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11388/) (2026)
- [Beyond No: Quantifying AI Over-Refusal and Emotional Attachment Boundaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14975/) (2025)
- [Over-Refusal and Representation Subspaces: A Mechanistic Analysis of Task-Conditioned Refusal in Aligned LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.27518/) (2026)
- [Please refuse to answer me! Mitigating Over-Refusal in Large Language Models via Adaptive Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17132/) (2026)
- [FreakOut-LLM: The Effect of Emotional Stimuli on Safety Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.04992/) (2026)
- [You Shouldn't Have Asked: A Pragmatics-Inspired Taxonomy for Evaluating LLM Refusals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30856/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Emotional expression can influence the safety decisions of large language models (LLMs), offering a potential avenue for improving safety alignment. Existing studies have mainly focused on how emotional expressions facilitate attacks under harmful requests, while overlooking their effects on benign requests. We find that emotional expression can also systematically increase refusal tendencies on benign requests, leading to unnecessary over-refusal. Based on this observation, we propose emotion-guided refusal subspace steering (EmoRSS), an activation-steering method that mitigates emotion-induced over-refusal while preserving refusal behaviour on harmful requests. Specifically, we first identify a refusal-sensitive layer using layer-wise linear probes and construct a refusal subspace from sparse autoencoder (SAE) features aligned with the probe direction. Next, we use paired regular and emotional requests with the same queries to estimate the mean activation shift in the features defining the refusal subspace. Finally, we decode this shift into an activation intervention vector and apply it in the reverse refusal direction during inference, without updating the backbone parameters. Experiments on two LLMs show that, when requests contain emotional expressions, our method achieves a more favourable trade-off between refusing harmful requests and answering benign ones than prior over-refusal mitigation baselines, while better preserving general task performance.