# Geometry-Aware Preference Optimization for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04980 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04980/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 38 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Image generation, text-to-image and editing](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/image-generation-text-to-image-and-editing/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Diffusion and multimodal model alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/diffusion-and-multimodal-model-alignment/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10789/) (2022)
- [FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15742/) (2025)
- [Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13301/) (2023)
- [Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01569/) (2023)
- [Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09341/) (2023)
- [Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05470/) (2025)
- [DPOK: Reinforcement Learning for Fine-tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16381/) (2023)
- [Directly Fine-Tuning Diffusion Models on Differentiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17400/) (2023)
- [Aligning Text-to-Image Models using Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12192/) (2023)
- [DanceGRPO: Unleashing GRPO on Visual Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07818/) (2025)
- [DiffusionNFT: Online Diffusion Reinforcement with Forward Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16117/) (2025)
- [CFG++: Manifold-constrained Classifier Free Guidance for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08070/) (2024)
- [Score-Based Generative Models Detect Manifolds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01018/) (2022)
- [Aligning Diffusion Models by Optimizing Human Utility](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04465/) (2024)
- [Aesthetic Post-Training Diffusion Models from Generic Preferences with Step-by-step Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04314/) (2024)
- [Margin-aware Preference Optimization for Aligning Diffusion Models without Reference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06424/) (2024)
- [Diffusion Model as a Noise-Aware Latent Reward Model for Step-Level Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01051/) (2025)
- [InPO: Inversion Preference Optimization with Reparametrized DDIM for Efficient Diffusion Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18454/) (2025)
- [Improving the Euclidean Diffusion Generation of Manifold Data by Mitigating Score Function Singularity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09922/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Preference alignment has become a standard practice for text-to-image diffusion models. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplifies this process by eliminating explicit reward modeling. Its diffusion variant, Diffusion-DPO, has become a widely adopted baseline. Diffusion-DPO essentially encourages the likelihood of preferred samples while suppressing dispreferred ones. In this paper, we revisit DPO-style alignment methods for diffusion models from the perspective of the manifold hypothesis. Under this view, natural images concentrate near a low-dimensional manifold embedded in the high-dimensional ambient space, whereas DPO directly optimizes preference distributions in the full space without accounting for this geometric structure. This creates a mismatch in the optimization dynamics: it suppresses geometry-preserving tangential updates, while insufficiently restricting hazardous normal-direction updates. This mismatch gradually degrades image quality and diversity. To address this issue, we propose Anisotropic Geometry-Aware Preference Optimization (APO), which replaces the uniform Euclidean treatment of prediction errors with a geometry-aware anisotropic metric derived from the reference model. Concretely, APO adaptively strengthens regularization in directions where the reference denoising function is highly sensitive, while relaxing constraints in directions that permit safe semantic adjustment. This recalibrates preference optimization according to the local manifold geometry, and maintains the original manifold structure. Experiments show that APO achieves strong performance and an average win rate exceeding 60% against various existing alignment methods across diverse benchmarks. It requires significantly fewer training steps than prior methods, and preserves generation diversity throughout training.