# Repeated-Measure Leakage, Distribution Shift, and Reliability under Partial Observation in Patient World Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04778 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04778/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical and surgical world models, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [Medical and surgical world models](https://mlsanity.com/wm/medical-and-surgical-world-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.10122/) (2018)
- [Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02530/) (2019)
- [Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08243/) (2023)
- [Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08500/) (2017)
- [Cross-validation failure: small sample sizes lead to large error bars](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.07581/) (2017)
- [Medical World Model: Generative Simulation of Tumor Evolution for Treatment Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02327/) (2025)
- [EHRWorld: A Patient-Centric Medical World Model for Long-Horizon Clinical Trajectories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03569/) (2026)
- [Joint Embeddings Go Temporal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25449/) (2025)
- [ChronoMedicalWorld: A Medical World Model for Learning Patient Trajectories from Longitudinal Care Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21963/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Patient world models are increasingly proposed for longitudinal prediction, intervention-aware reasoning, and clinical-trial simulation. Causal or clinical intervention validity is distinct from predictive generalization and reliability; before making stronger claims, the underlying predictive state should generalize across patients, survive realistic shifts and missing observations, and expose failure through meaningful reliability signals. We evaluate these prerequisites in a deliberately narrow setting: short-horizon digital-biomarker forecasting from PhysioNet GaitPDB, comprising 165 participants, 306 recordings, and 51,129 context-future pairs. Using persistence, ridge, MLP, GRU, Transformer, and a compact JEPA-style predictor, we build an evaluation ladder that progressively removes raw temporal overlap, same-recording familiarity, and same-patient familiarity before testing unseen-patient generalization. For GRU, NMSE rises from 0.1227 under random-window splitting to 0.1393 after eliminating raw train-test overlap and to 0.1961 under patient holdout. Among 54 participants with repeated recordings, exposure to a different recording from the same patient improves GRU NMSE from 0.2177 to 0.1556, while a recording-excluded identity hypothesis is not supported at the participant level. Under participant-held-out evaluation, MLP and Transformer are statistically indistinguishable. Study shift, a four-times-longer prediction gap, and partial observation further degrade performance; under 50% temporal masking, Transformer NMSE rises to 0.611 while MC-dropout predictive variance falls. We do not claim a longitudinal or intervention-aware simulator. Instead, the results support a prerequisite evaluation stack of patient separation, repeated-measure controls, shift, missingness, and uncertainty validation before stronger patient-world-model claims are trusted.
