# Action-Consequence Alignment for Reliable Planning and Self-Improving in Latent World Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04539 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04539/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Latent dynamics models and model-based RL, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 42 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [Latent dynamics models and model-based RL](https://mlsanity.com/wm/latent-dynamics-models-and-model-based-rl/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03748/) (2018)
- [Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09748/) (2022)
- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12877/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04137/) (2023)
- [Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imagination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01603/) (2019)
- [World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.10122/) (2018)
- [Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01412/) (2020)
- [Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.04551/) (2018)
- [Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.05363/) (2017)
- [VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04906/) (2021)
- [Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08243/) (2023)
- [DeepMind Control Suite](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.00690/) (2018)
- [V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09985/) (2025)
- [Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08471/) (2024)
- [DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04983/) (2024)
- [LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19312/) (2026)
- [LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08544/) (2025)
- [OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20092/) (2024)
- [Learning to Poke by Poking: Experiential Learning of Intuitive Physics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.07419/) (2016)
- [Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14819/) (2025)
- [Advancing Humanoid Locomotion: Mastering Challenging Terrains with Denoising World Model Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14472/) (2024)
- [Friendly Sharpness-Aware Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12350/) (2024)
- [Learning Latent Action World Models In The Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05230/) (2026)
- [World Models and Predictive Coding for Cognitive and Developmental Robotics: Frontiers and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.05832/) (2023)
- [Multi-Task Interactive Robot Fleet Learning with Visual World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22689/) (2024)
- [Sensorimotor World Models: Perception for Action via Inverse Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20104/) (2026)
- [World Action Verifier: Self-Improving World Models via Forward-Inverse Asymmetry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01985/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Latent world models learn to predict observed transitions, yet low prediction error alone does not guarantee reliable planning. Inspired by self tickling experiments in neuroscience showing that disrupting motor sensory correspondence increases prediction mismatch, we examine whether learned world models preserve an analogous action consequence correspondence.The results show nearby alternatives can receive lower prediction errors despite producing physical outcomes farther from the recorded target. With that future treated as a goal, this reveals a concrete prediction planning mismatch: the model assigns a lower cost to an action that achieves the target less accurately. To mitigate this gap, we introduce Action Consequence Alignment (ACA), a training objective that complements forward prediction by penalizing the prediction error advantage of locally searched alternatives over factual actions without additional model components or environment interactions during training. The same principle can also guide additional data collection for self improvement. We demonstrate that across diverse environments and evaluation settings, ACA improves planning performance and reduces real goal error, while ACA guided data collection outperforms random local sampling. These results support action consequence alignment as a practical principle for bridging predictive learning and reliable planning.