# Questioning the Questions: Sustaining Self-Evolution in Reasoning Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04299 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04299/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 40 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12186/) (2024)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Improve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11610/) (2022)
- [Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03335/) (2025)
- [TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16084/) (2025)
- [R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05004/) (2025)
- [Learning to Reason without External Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19590/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13446/) (2024)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15134/) (2025)
- [BIG-Bench Extra Hard](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19187/) (2025)
- [OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20512/) (2025)
- [SPIRAL: Self-Play on Zero-Sum Games Incentivizes Reasoning via Multi-Agent Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.24119/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Self-Evolution of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14387/) (2024)
- [SPICE: Self-Play In Corpus Environments Improves Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24684/) (2025)
- [Self-Questioning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03682/) (2025)
- [VisPlay: Self-Evolving Vision-Language Models from Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.15661/) (2025)
- [Dr. Zero: Self-Evolving Search Agents without Training Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07055/) (2026)
- [Guided Self-Evolving LLMs with Minimal Human Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02472/) (2025)
- [MM-Zero: Self-Evolving Multi-Model Vision Language Models From Zero Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.09206/) (2026)
- [TTCS: Test-Time Curriculum Synthesis for Self-Evolving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22628/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Self-evolving reasoning models learn from their own generated questions, yet repeated self-training can lead to performance collapse. In this paper, we investigate why performance deteriorates over successive rounds and how to sustain self-evolution. Our analysis identifies two recurring quality problems in self-generated questions: invalid questions and repeated variants of the same mathematical questions. First, invalid questions become more prevalent across rounds, and answer-consistency filtering further increases their proportion in training data. Second, existing question diversity controls based on lexical similarity can miss mathematically equivalent questions expressed in different ways, which leads to question diversity collapse in later training rounds. Building on these findings, we introduce R-Quest, which uses question validity and novelty feedback to guide self-evolution. We first train the solver to recognize and reject invalid questions, then use its judgments to guide questioner rewards and filter solver training data. To avoid question repetition, we use a frozen base model to compare sampled question pairs and provide novelty feedback. Empirically, our method consistently achieves the highest average performance on 12 benchmarks in mathematical reasoning, general-domain reasoning, and code generation across two model families. Additionally, R-Quest maintains stable performance gains over ten rounds of self-evolution, peaking in the final round and outperforming R-Zero by 17.32 points.