# SHarP: Saliency-based Pruning of Agent Harnesses

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04178 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04178/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 31 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Tool learning and function calling](https://mlsanity.com/agents/tool-learning-and-function-calling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03635/) (2018)
- [Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02626/) (2015)
- [Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.08710/) (2016)
- [Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10650/) (2019)
- [SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02340/) (2018)
- [Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.06519/) (2017)
- [τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07982/) (2025)
- [Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.03665/) (2016)
- [AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10762/) (2024)
- [Automated Design of Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08435/) (2024)
- [Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.28052/) (2026)
- [PaperQA: Retrieval-Augmented Generative Agent for Scientific Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07559/) (2023)
- [Agentic Harness Engineering: Observability-Driven Automatic Evolution of Coding-Agent Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.25850/) (2026)
- [Cut the Crap: An Economical Communication Pipeline for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02506/) (2024)
- [ReSum: Unlocking Long-Horizon Search Intelligence via Context Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13313/) (2025)
- [Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13740/) (2024)
- [Self-Harness: Harnesses That Improve Themselves](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09498/) (2026)
- [AgentFold: Long-Horizon Web Agents with Proactive Context Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24699/) (2025)
- [Natural-Language Agent Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25723/) (2026)
- [The Complexity Trap: Simple Observation Masking Is as Efficient as LLM Summarization for Agent Context Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21433/) (2025)
- [Code as Agent Harness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18747/) (2026)
- [DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18137/) (2026)
- [Adaptive Graph Pruning for Multi-Agent Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02951/) (2025)
- [RCR-Router: Efficient Role-Aware Context Routing for Multi-Agent LLM Systems with Structured Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.04903/) (2025)
- [Adapting the Interface, Not the Model: Runtime Harness Adaptation for Deterministic LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22166/) (2026)
- [Aviary: training language agents on challenging scientific tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21154/) (2024)
- [JIT-Agent: Scaling Harness Intelligence via Just-in-Time Harness Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25593/) (2026)
- [HARBOR: Automated Harness Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.20938/) (2026)
- [Beyond Prompts: Measuring and Optimizing LLM Tool-Agent Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.05736/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Agent harnesses are systems that coordinate model calls, tool use, and task execution to help large language models complete complex tasks. To meet task requirements and address failures, these systems are often iteratively refined by amending and patching their instructions, tools, and workflows, continuously increasing harness complexity. It is therefore unclear whether some resulting harness modules are redundant, introducing substantial token overhead with little, if any, performance gain. Inspired by neural network pruning, in this paper, we study harness pruning as a means of striking a better balance between task performance and token cost. We propose SHarP (Saliency-based Harness Pruning), a simple yet effective pruning strategy based on the saliency of each harness module with respect to performance and efficiency. Specifically, we first identify tools, instructions, and supporting mechanisms as components that can be individually disabled. We then estimate the saliency of each module by ablating it and assessing its task performance and token cost relative to the full set of single-module ablations. Modules with the smallest contribution to performance or largest computational overhead are subsequently pruned. Our evaluation across various harnesses on held-out validation sets reveals a surprising finding: most harnesses that we studied are highly redundant and can maintain comparable performance and efficiency even after a substantial portion of their modules are pruned. Our pruning approach and empirical findings provide new perspectives on agent harness design and optimization.