# Bayes-Sufficient Compression Is Not Enough: How Does Communication Help Multi-Agent Systems?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03769 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.03769/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent LLM systems pair a sender with broad context and an executor with a limited local view. We study when a short message improves the executor's next decision, when raw context is preferable, and when a stronger sender helps. Our framework, receiver-relative bounded coordination, expresses message utility as receiver gain minus protocol tax. Compression beats raw context when tax savings exceed losses from omitted information and decoder mismatch. Even Bayes-sufficient compression can fail when a bounded executor cannot use its surface form. A three-stage decomposition separates externalization, absorption, and action closure, explaining how errors remain after the correct content reaches the receiver. Under a single-crossing condition, sender upgrades help above a receiver-burden threshold. Across six benchmarks, the same Qwen protocol raises ContextBench joint accuracy from 0.633 to 0.775 but lowers ToolSandbox from 0.889 to 0.653. Fixed-message replay reveals closure failures despite correct artifact recovery. These results guide an inference-time selector that improves the accuracy-cost frontier on the evaluated communication regimes.