# DEPICT: Scoring Text-to-Image Alignment by Answer Agreement

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03617 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.03617/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 31 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Diffusion and multimodal model alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/diffusion-and-multimodal-model-alignment/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02114/) (2021)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05977/) (2023)
- [FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15742/) (2025)
- [Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13301/) (2023)
- [Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01569/) (2023)
- [Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09341/) (2023)
- [DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14108/) (2023)
- [When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01936/) (2022)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01291/) (2024)
- [TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11897/) (2023)
- [Gemma 4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02770/) (2026)
- [Davidsonian Scene Graph: Improving Reliability in Fine-grained Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18235/) (2023)
- [Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10240/) (2023)
- [What You See is What You Read? Improving Text-Image Alignment Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10400/) (2023)
- [ImagenHub: Standardizing the evaluation of conditional image generation models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01596/) (2023)
- [Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09425/) (2025)
- [EvalMuse-40K: A Reliable and Fine-Grained Benchmark with Comprehensive Human Annotations for Text-to-Image Generation Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18150/) (2024)
- [Qwen-Image-2.0 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10730/) (2026)
- [Divide, Evaluate, and Refine: Evaluating and Improving Text-to-Image Alignment with Iterative VQA Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04749/) (2023)
- [CLIP Behaves like a Bag-of-Words Model Cross-modally but not Uni-modally](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03566/) (2025)
- [Self-Supervised Flow Matching for Scalable Multi-Modal Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06507/) (2026)
- [Automatic Evaluation for Text-to-image Generation: Task-decomposed Framework, Distilled Training, and Meta-evaluation Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15488/) (2024)
- [HALP: Detecting Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models without Generating a Single Token](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05465/) (2026)
- [LongT2IBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Long Text-to-Image Generation with Graph-structured Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.09271/) (2025)
- [Early Estimation of Language to Latent Alignment in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.08505/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Image-text alignment is a core problem in computer vision with applications in caption evaluation, hallucination detection, data curation, and the benchmarking of text-to-image (T2I) generators. As T2I models improve, benchmarking has become demanding, requiring metrics capable of finding a series of issues like missing objects, swapped attributes, miscounts, and ignored negations. Recent work addresses this by fine-tuning evaluators on preference data or by prompting a vision-language model, either holistically with the caption or with decomposed verification questions. However, existing approaches fall short: fine-tuned metrics remain bound to one backbone and training distribution; holistic metrics miss fine-grained details; and decomposed metrics rely on a fixed-YES assumption that penalizes faithful images whenever that assumption fails. In contrast, we propose DEPICT, a training-free metric that replaces fixed reference answers with expected agreement between image-based and caption-only answers, weighting questions by how decisively the caption determines them. By replacing fixed references, our agreement rule increases negation accuracy from 19% to 88%. To recover the context lost during decomposition, DEPICT merges this agreement score with a holistic score. We evaluate DEPICT on five benchmarks and eleven backbones from three model families and find that it surpasses all training-free metrics and exceeds fine-tuned evaluators on two out of three human-correlation benchmarks.