# Conditional Capacity and Routing in Mixture-of-Experts Particle Transformers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02701 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02701/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Expert routing strategies, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts.
- Builds on 10 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Mixture-of-experts / [Expert routing strategies](https://mlsanity.com/moe/expert-routing-strategies/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03961/) (2021)
- [GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Sharding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.16668/) (2020)
- [Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05974/) (2021)
- [Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.09368/) (2022)
- [Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01169/) (2022)
- [MegaBlocks: Efficient Sparse Training with Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15841/) (2022)
- [Particle Transformer for Jet Tagging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03772/) (2022)
- [The Myth of Expert Specialization in MoEs: Why Routing Reflects Geometry, Not Necessarily Domain Expertise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09780/) (2026)
- [Mixture-of-Experts Graph Transformers for Interpretable Particle Collision Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03432/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models can increase parameter capacity without proportionally increasing active computation, but it is unclear how this trade-off behaves in particle-physics transformers. We study dense and MoE Particle Transformers on 188-class JetClass-II, varying expert count, routing capacity, top-K, and auxiliary loss. We find that, when token dropping is avoided, top-1 MoE models improve over the dense baseline at nearly unchanged nominal forward compute, while further increasing the number of stored experts produces little additional accuracy gain. Activating multiple experts per token yields additional predictive improvements at higher computational cost. Routing analyses show that expert assignments become more strongly associated with particle identity and kinematics in some configurations, but this structure does not increase monotonically with classification performance. These results highlight the need to distinguish stored parameter capacity, active computation, routing capacity, and routing organization when evaluating sparse expert models for jet classification. Code and experiment configurations are available at https://github.com/kpendiyala/MPT.