# From Reasoning Failures to Composable Video Spatial Intelligence

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01999 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01999/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 49 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 49)

- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12168/) (2024)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [Gemma 4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02770/) (2026)
- [VideoChat-R1: Enhancing Spatio-Temporal Perception via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06958/) (2025)
- [SpaceR: Reinforcing MLLMs in Video Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01805/) (2025)
- [Cambrian-S: Towards Spatial Supersensing in Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04670/) (2025)
- [RoboRefer: Towards Spatial Referring with Reasoning in Vision-Language Models for Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04308/) (2025)
- [ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21500/) (2025)
- [MindCube: Spatial Mental Modeling from Limited Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21458/) (2025)
- [Visual Spatial Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05491/) (2025)
- [Scaling Spatial Intelligence with Multimodal Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.13719/) (2025)
- [STI-Bench: Are MLLMs Ready for Precise Spatial-Temporal World Understanding?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23765/) (2025)
- [Mind's Eye of LLMs: Visualization-of-Thought Elicits Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03622/) (2024)
- [VAGEN: Reinforcing World Model Reasoning for Multi-Turn VLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16907/) (2025)
- [Improved Visual-Spatial Reasoning via R1-Zero-Like Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00883/) (2025)
- [3D-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in 3D VLMs for Unified Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23478/) (2025)
- [Visual Agentic AI for Spatial Reasoning with a Dynamic API](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06787/) (2025)
- [How Far are VLMs from Visual Spatial Intelligence? A Benchmark-Driven Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18905/) (2025)
- [MMSI-Video-Bench: A Holistic Benchmark for Video-Based Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10863/) (2025)
- [Embodied-R: Collaborative Framework for Activating Embodied Spatial Reasoning in Foundation Models via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12680/) (2025)
- [Spatial Understanding from Videos: Structured Prompts Meet Simulation Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03642/) (2025)
- [OST-Bench: Evaluating the Capabilities of MLLMs in Online Spatio-temporal Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07984/) (2025)
- [DSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Dynamic Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18873/) (2025)
- [SpaceTools: Tool-Augmented Spatial Reasoning via Double Interactive RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.04069/) (2025)
- [Thinking with Blueprints: Assisting Vision-Language Models in Spatial Reasoning via Structured Object Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.01984/) (2026)
- [See&Trek: Training-Free Spatial Prompting for Multimodal Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16087/) (2025)
- [Scaling Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Tool-Integrated Reasoning in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.19773/) (2025)
- [ReVSI: Rebuilding Visual Spatial Intelligence Evaluation for Accurate Assessment of VLM 3D Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.24300/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Spatial reasoning benchmarks evaluate vision-language models across diverse tasks, but task-level scores do not reveal which underlying capabilities account for success or failure. Each task requires recovering spatial evidence, representing geometry, and reasoning over it. We disentangle these capabilities by comparing predicted and ground-truth spatial context under a shared schema and coordinate contract. This comparison reveals four recurring sources of error: inaccurate perception, missing information in the spatial context, selection of the wrong measurement, and errors in reference frames or in tracking position and orientation. Guided by this diagnosis, we develop CROSS, a training-free library of typed geometric operators and spatial skills that function over available evidence to support reliable video spatial reasoning. The resulting library supplies verified context to non-coding VLMs or callable skills to a SpatialClaw agent. We evaluate methodname on five benchmarks. methodname raises the average score from 55.9% to 60.2% on ReVSI and improves the SpatialClaw result from 62.8% to 66.3% on DSI-Bench. These gains demonstrate that explicit handling of spatial conventions can repair systematic reasoning failures without additional training.
