# MoLE: Mixture of Latent Experts for Complementary Visual Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01917 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01917/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 42 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03961/) (2021)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10355/) (2023)
- [Root Mean Square Layer Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07467/) (2019)
- [CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.06890/) (2016)
- [Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.03118/) (2017)
- [Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16860/) (2024)
- [Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06769/) (2024)
- [A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01718/) (2022)
- [Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06749/) (2025)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04790/) (2020)
- [V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14135/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-CoT: Let Vision Language Models Reason Step-by-Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10440/) (2024)
- [ST-MoE: Designing Stable and Transferable Sparse Expert Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08906/) (2022)
- [Scene Text Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13648/) (2019)
- [Visual7W: Grounded Question Answering in Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.03416/) (2015)
- [Visual Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00363/) (2022)
- [Visual CoT: Advancing Multi-Modal Language Models with a Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16999/) (2024)
- [Pixel Reasoner: Incentivizing Pixel-Space Reasoning with Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15966/) (2025)
- [IconQA: A New Benchmark for Abstract Diagram Understanding and Visual Language Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13214/) (2021)
- [CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21074/) (2025)
- [TallyQA: Answering Complex Counting Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.12440/) (2018)
- [Math-LLaVA: Bootstrapping Mathematical Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17294/) (2024)
- [Machine Mental Imagery: Empower Multimodal Reasoning with Latent Visual Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17218/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Latent visual reasoning equips vision--language models with continuous intermediate states that can process visual evidence without explicit textual reasoning traces or repeated image operations. However, existing methods often allow multiple latent tokens to access the same visual evidence through shared value projections, providing no mechanism for them to extract complementary visual information; simply increasing the latent budget can therefore yield redundant latent representations. We argue that effective latent reasoning should encourage different latent tokens to extract complementary visual information, and thereby act as specialized visual experts. Based on this insight, we propose MoLE, a Mixture of Latent Experts framework that controls both what visual evidence each latent visual expert observes and how it transforms that evidence. MoLE isolates latent visual experts during evidence extraction and uses dedicated latent summary experts to aggregate the complementary representations of latent visual experts. A two-stage training pipeline first forces visual evidence through this latent pathway and then restores direct visual access, requiring neither predefined expert roles nor intermediate visual targets. Across five visual reasoning benchmarks, MoLE achieves an average score of 78.6, outperforming data-matched supervised fine-tuning by 4.9 and the strongest evaluated latent visual reasoning baseline at the same latent budget by 3.6. Representation analyses show lower latent-state similarity and more diverse visual attention, while masking the latent pathway reduces average performance by 9.2. These results demonstrate that specializing latent computation is more effective than merely increasing the number of latent tokens.