# End-to-End Learning vs. Modular Architectures: Comparative Insights into Autonomous Driving Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01746 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01746/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in End-to-end system architecture, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving.
- Builds on 39 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- End-to-end autonomous driving / [End-to-end system architecture](https://mlsanity.com/driving/end-to-end-system-architecture/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01497/) (2015)
- [Mask R-CNN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06870/) (2017)
- [You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02640/) (2015)
- [Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.5602/) (2013)
- [SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.02325/) (2015)
- [Trust Region Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.05477/) (2015)
- [CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.03938/) (2017)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.06461/) (2015)
- [Prioritized Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.05952/) (2015)
- [EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.09070/) (2019)
- [End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.07316/) (2016)
- [Simple Online and Realtime Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.00763/) (2016)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.00444/) (2020)
- [End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16927/) (2023)
- [End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.02410/) (2017)
- [An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.06711/) (2018)
- [Learning by Cheating](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.12294/) (2019)
- [A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05113/) (2019)
- [Learning to Drive in a Day](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00412/) (2018)
- [A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-driving Urban Vehicles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.07446/) (2016)
- [End-to-end Interpretable Neural Motion Planner](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06679/) (2021)
- [End-to-End Urban Driving by Imitating a Reinforcement Learning Coach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.08265/) (2021)
- [Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Art](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05519/) (2017)
- [Perceive, Predict, and Plan: Safe Motion Planning Through Interpretable Semantic Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.05930/) (2020)
- [DriveAdapter: Breaking the Coupling Barrier of Perception and Planning in End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00398/) (2023)
- [A Survey of End-to-End Driving: Architectures and Training Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.06404/) (2020)
- [Recent Advancements in End-to-End Autonomous Driving using Deep Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04370/) (2023)
- [Urban Driving with Conditional Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00177/) (2019)
- [Milestones in Autonomous Driving and Intelligent Vehicles: Survey of Surveys](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17220/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous driving systems have become a central focus of intelligent transportation research, with End-to-End Learning and Modular Architectures offering two prominent design paradigms for their implementation. E2E Learning uses deep learning algorithms to map raw sensory inputs directly to driving actuators, providing a streamlined and adaptable solution. while Modular Architectures employ a pipeline-based approach, dividing the system into distinct subsystems for perception, cognition, planning, and control. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of these paradigms, focusing on their strengths, limitations, and trade-offs to provide insights into their suitability for various autonomous driving applications. The study evaluates key factors such as interpretability, scalability, robustness, and real-world applicability. While End-to-End Learning emphasizes simplicity and adaptability in dynamic environments, it lacks transparency and is highly dependent on large datasets. Conversely, Modular Architectures offer superior interpretability and task-specific optimization, but face challenges related to integration complexity and scalability. To address these limitations, hybrid approaches that combine the strengths of both paradigms have emerged, offering a promising direction for overcoming these challenges. Beyond this comparative synthesis, following work proposes a Four-Dimensional Architecture Selection Framework, comprising twelve binary criteria across safety, operating environment, data/computational resources, and deployment context, and validate it against ten published autonomous driving systems, correctly recommending 7/10 deployed architectures. This work synthesizes existing literature to highlight key trade-offs between the paradigms and identifies hybrid architectures as a promising direction for future research.