# Not All Error Yields to Scale: Where Scaling Stops in Vision-Language Inference

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01640 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01640/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 18 of its 54 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04417/) (2024)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Perception: High-Resolution Image Perception Meets Visual RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01222/) (2025)
- [SPARC: Separating Perception And Reasoning Circuits for Test-time Scaling of VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06566/) (2026)
- [The Perceptual Bandwidth Bottleneck in Vision-Language Models: Active Visual Reasoning via Sequential Experimental Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.01345/) (2026)
- [VistaHop: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Visual DeepSearch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03273/) (2026)
- [Item Response Scaling Laws: A Measurement Theory Approach for Efficient and Generalizable Neural Scaling Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.07616/) (2026)
- [Stable Curves, Unstable Items: Item-Level Scaling Heterogeneity in Video LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07014/) (2026)
- [Look Less, Think Faster: Joint Token-Compute Adaptation for Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20357/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) face a fixed-budget trade-off between processing more visual information for fine-grained perception and using a larger language backbone for complex reasoning. Existing studies do not tell us which combination of backbone size and input resolution to deploy, especially in high-resolution deployments. To address this gap, we propose the Separable Law that describes how VLM performance changes with language backbone size and visual token count. We fit the law to measurements from 26 InternVL and QwenVL models, with language backbone sizes from 1B to 72B, on four high-resolution benchmarks with image sizes from 224 pixels to 8K. We find that the questions responding to scaling can be predicted from the skill they require, while a substantial fraction never responds at all. We also find that the two model families gain similarly from a larger backbone, while their gains from more visual tokens differ sharply. Combined with a cost law, the Separable Law gives a closed-form rule for allocating compute between backbone size and visual tokens. When deployment is limited to available configurations, the law identifies model and image sizes that perform close to the best feasible choice under the same budget. We hope our work offers a principled way to decide how much a model should be allowed to see at high resolution, given what it must reason about.