# Revisiting Cross-Reconstruction for Generalizable Deepfake Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01544 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01544/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 30 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Taming Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09841/) (2020)
- [Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02357/) (2016)
- [Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06868/) (2017)
- [FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08971/) (2019)
- [Disentangling by Factorising](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05983/) (2018)
- [Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12962/) (2019)
- [Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Clues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.09355/) (2020)
- [StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.00273/) (2022)
- [Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.13458/) (2019)
- [Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08376/) (2022)
- [Diverse Image-to-Image Translation via Disentangled Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.00948/) (2018)
- [Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12376/) (2021)
- [On the Detection of Digital Face Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01717/) (2019)
- [Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01856/) (2021)
- [The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.08854/) (2019)
- [UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13949/) (2023)
- [DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01426/) (2023)
- [DF40: Toward Next-Generation Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13495/) (2024)
- [Transcending Forgery Specificity with Latent Space Augmentation for Generalizable Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11278/) (2023)
- [Implicit Identity Leakage: The Stumbling Block to Improving Deepfake Detection Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.14457/) (2022)
- [LAA-Net: Localized Artifact Attention Network for Quality-Agnostic and Generalizable Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13856/) (2024)
- [Preserving Fairness Generalization in Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17229/) (2024)
- [SeeABLE: Soft Discrepancies and Bounded Contrastive Learning for Exposing Deepfakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11296/) (2022)
- [Towards More General Video-based Deepfake Detection through Facial Component Guided Adaptation for Foundation Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05583/) (2024)
- [Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Reprogramming Visual-Language Model for General Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02664/) (2024)
- [Exploring Unbiased Deepfake Detection via Token-Level Shuffling and Mixing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04376/) (2025)
- [Learning Spatiotemporal Inconsistency via Thumbnail Layout for Face Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10261/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Existing image forgery detectors often suffer from generalization to unseen manipulation methods due to the limited ability to capture transferable forensic cues. Recent cross-reconstruction based methods attempt to improve generalization through semantic-artifact disentanglement, but typically align heterogeneous artifacts across generators and exclude artifact representations during reconstruction, which may overlook the inherent diversity and visual cues of manipulation artifacts. In this work, we revisit cross-reconstruction and introduce an artifact-oriented disentanglement framework for robust image forgery detection. We argue that artifact diversity, i.e., the intrinsic variations of manipulation artifacts introduced by different generation processes, contains complementary forensic cues rather than undesirable domain variations. Instead of enforcing explicit artifact alignment, our framework preserves diverse artifact characteristics through semantically aligned cross-generator reconstruction. Furthermore, we incorporate artifact representations into the reconstruction process and introduce a masked frequency-aware reconstruction strategy to emphasize manipulation-related residuals while reducing semantic interference. This design enables the model to learn transferable forensic representations from diverse artifacts. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate improvements under both cross-dataset and cross-generator evaluation settings. Further analysis and ablation studies validate the effectiveness of artifact diversity preservation and artifact-aware cross-reconstruction.