# Persistent Depth Ordering amid Shifting Block-Bypass Responses in Language Model Pretraining

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01165 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01165/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01373/) (2023)
- [Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.05217/) (2023)
- [ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expect](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03853/) (2024)
- [Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16042/) (2023)
- [2 OLMo 2 Furious](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00656/) (2024)
- [SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02737/) (2025)
- [The Unreasonable Ineffectiveness of the Deeper Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17887/) (2024)
- [The Remarkable Robustness of LLMs: Stages of Inference?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19384/) (2024)
- [Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17030/) (2023)
- [LLM Circuit Analyses Are Consistent Across Training and Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10827/) (2024)
- [Explorations of Self-Repair in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15390/) (2024)
- [Investigating Layer Importance in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14381/) (2024)
- [Layer Importance for Mathematical Reasoning is Forged in Pre-Training and Invariant after Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22638/) (2025)
- [Crosscoding Through Time: Tracking Emergence & Consolidation Of Linguistic Representations Throughout LLM Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.05291/) (2025)
- [Divergent Token Metrics: Measuring degradation to prune away LLM components -- and optimize quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01544/) (2023)
- [No Free Swap: Protocol-Dependent Layer Redundancy in Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16234/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Layer interventions are widely used to probe the internal organization of language models, yet most analyses examine a single training checkpoint even though model representations and computations evolve throughout pretraining. This leaves open which depth-dependent intervention responses reflect persistent organization and which are transient consequences of training. We study this question using single-block identity bypass on fixed teacher-forced contexts across five released trajectories and 11 model-domain combinations. We find that block-bypass responses retain recognizable depth ordering while their magnitudes redistribute: nearby checkpoints preserve stronger rank correspondence than distant ones, and large changes concentrate at positions that recur across text samples and transfer across evaluation domains. Controlled experiments further show that changes in the natural bypass effect cannot be reduced to a single downstream sensitivity: in replicated Pythia runs, local missing-update magnitude grows while the pooled matched downstream response decreases, whereas OLMo-2 7B exhibits a different balance. These matched responses also depend on perturbation strength and direction, without identifying targeted compensation. Together, our results show that longitudinal layer sensitivity is structured but not static, and that single-checkpoint intervention responses should be interpreted in the context of how the underlying perturbation pathway evolves during training.