# CtrlWAM: Controllable World Action Models with Aligned Intent and Foresight

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00859 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00859/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and robot world models, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 27 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [Embodied and robot world models](https://mlsanity.com/wm/embodied-and-robot-world-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20314/) (2025)
- [VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17982/) (2023)
- [Genie: Generative Interactive Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15391/) (2024)
- [Social GAN: Socially Acceptable Trajectories with Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.10892/) (2018)
- [Diffusion Forcing: Next-token Prediction Meets Full-Sequence Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01392/) (2024)
- [GAIA-1: A Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17080/) (2023)
- [RoboTwin 2.0: A Scalable Data Generator and Benchmark with Strong Domain Randomization for Robust Bimanual Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18088/) (2025)
- [World Action Models are Zero-shot Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15922/) (2026)
- [UniPC: A Unified Predictor-Corrector Framework for Fast Sampling of Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04867/) (2023)
- [Fast-WAM: Do World Action Models Need Test-time Future Imagination?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16666/) (2026)
- [Vista: A Generalizable Driving World Model with High Fidelity and Versatile Controllability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17398/) (2024)
- [EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11440/) (2023)
- [Deep Visual Foresight for Planning Robot Motion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.00696/) (2016)
- [Unified World Models: Coupling Video and Action Diffusion for Pretraining on Large Robotic Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02792/) (2025)
- [Cosmos 3: Omnimodal World Models for Physical AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02800/) (2026)
- [Difix3D+: Improving 3D Reconstructions with Single-Step Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01774/) (2025)
- [WorldScore: A Unified Evaluation Benchmark for World Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00983/) (2025)
- [WorldArena: A Unified Benchmark for Evaluating Perception and Functional Utility of Embodied World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08971/) (2026)
- [Unified 4D World Action Modeling from Video Priors with Asynchronous Denoising](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26694/) (2026)
- [VideoVLA: Video Generators Can Be Generalizable Robot Manipulators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.06963/) (2025)
- [EWMBench: Evaluating Scene, Motion, and Semantic Quality in Embodied World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09694/) (2025)
- [Beyond FVD: Enhanced Evaluation Metrics for Video Generation Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05203/) (2024)
- [DIDO: Distilling Interaction-Centric Dynamics into One-Step Denoising for World Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15570/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

World action models (WAMs) jointly predict actions (intent) and visual future (foresight). Standard training adds noise to recorded actions and video simultaneously, but such training paradigms introduce a mismatch: perturbed actions imply counterfactual future visual, while the noised video remains tied to the GT recording. In low-noise regime, the scene geometry and even the dynamic behavior remain clearly visible from the noisy future frames despite the added noise. We present CtrlWAM, which executes perturbed actions in a simulator and pairs them with their noised visual consequences for joint WAM learning. To accommodate the different denoising requirements of video and actions, we introduce warped video--action noise schedules that aim to keep visual layout responsive as action predictions evolve. We further extend the action interface from ego-only control to a variable number of agent streams, allowing a unified model to represent predicted or commanded futures for multiple agents. Driving experiments show more accurate action forecasts, closer agreement between generated video and actions, and better following of supplied commands; robotics experiments show stronger motion fidelity and controllability. Matched controls support the benefit of off-path renders for command following and manipulation fidelity. Together, these findings contribute to a more controllable world action model. Project page: https://ctrl-wam.github.io/