# How AI Agents Discover Scientific Equations: From Hydrotope Rediscovery to New Water-Wave Amplitudes

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00435 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00435/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 47 of its 91 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 47)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17760/) (2023)
- [RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06654/) (2024)
- [Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15334/) (2023)
- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07924/) (2023)
- [AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13131/) (2025)
- [CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11738/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01680/) (2024)
- [AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11481/) (2019)
- [Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04227/) (2025)
- [Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientist](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18864/) (2025)
- [MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03302/) (2023)
- [Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11287/) (2020)
- [AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13178/) (2024)
- [Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04871/) (2019)
- [Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.14351/) (2021)
- [End-to-end symbolic regression with transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10532/) (2022)
- [Neural Symbolic Regression that Scales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06427/) (2021)
- [Extrapolation and learning equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02995/) (2016)
- [SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14131/) (2021)
- [Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10873/) (2022)
- [Symbolic Regression via Neural-Guided Genetic Programming Population Seeding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.00053/) (2021)
- [Symbolic Regression with a Learned Concept Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09359/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We study how AI agents discover and validate scientific formulas using a controlled case study of the hydrotope, a recently discovered geometric formula that combines the different polynomial pieces of nonlinear surface-wave scattering into one global expression. This problem is deceptively difficult: simple formulas can hold within individual frequency regions, but the global result must identify their boundaries and combine exponentially many potentially active terms. We reconstruct how the formula was originally discovered through human--agent collaboration and analyze 18 single-prompt rediscovery runs under no hint and two forms of human guidance: a false hint representing an incorrect prior and a true hint representing domain-informed insight. Only four recover the formula across all kinematic chambers (i.e., regions in which a single polynomial form applies), while most unsuccessful runs find correct chamber polynomials but fail to combine them or test their full domain. Conventional and LLM-assisted symbolic regression and standard machine-learning regressors likewise fail to recover the global formula in our experiments. Guided by these failure modes, we test a PI+two-student workflow in which a coordinating lead agent assigns complementary analytic and numerical tasks to two research agents and independently evaluates their results. The PI+two-student team successfully rediscovers the complete hydrotope formula, while the same workflow applied to the harder three negative wavenumber problem discovers a new independent verified analytic expression for the six-point amplitude A6.