# The Life Cycle of a Massive Activation: Stochastic Birth, Weight-Decay-Driven Growth, and Competitive Consolidation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00423 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00423/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Layer Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06450/) (2016)
- [Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17453/) (2023)
- [Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01373/) (2023)
- [Root Mean Square Layer Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07467/) (2019)
- [LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07339/) (2022)
- [Vision Transformers Need Registers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16588/) (2023)
- [Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00159/) (2024)
- [Massive Activations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17762/) (2024)
- [When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10781/) (2024)
- [Quantizable Transformers: Removing Outliers by Helping Attention Heads Do Nothing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.12929/) (2023)
- [Why do LLMs attend to the first token?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02732/) (2025)
- [BERT Busters: Outlier Dimensions that Disrupt Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.06990/) (2021)
- [Rotational Equilibrium: How Weight Decay Balances Learning Across Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17212/) (2023)
- [The Super Weight in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07191/) (2024)
- [Intriguing Properties of Quantization at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19268/) (2023)
- [Outlier-Safe Pre-Training for Robust 4-Bit Quantization of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19697/) (2025)
- [Hidden Dynamics of Massive Activations in Transformer Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03616/) (2025)
- [Attention Sinks Induce Gradient Sinks: Massive Activations as Gradient Regulators in Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17771/) (2026)
- [Massive Activations Are Architecturally Robust: A Controlled Scratch/Commitment Residual Stream Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20743/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Massive activations, residual-stream coordinates with magnitudes far larger than typical activations, are associated with attention sinks in transformers, but how their scale is regulated during training remains incompletely understood. Combining training-trajectory analyses and controlled interventions, we trace their emergence, growth, and consolidation. Sink-carrying channels vary across random seeds but stabilize early within each run. Over longer training, surrounding channels erode and the sink concentrates onto a few redundant carriers. Across ablations, gradient attenuation follows the sink token's collective root-mean-square magnitude rather than any single channel, making collective scale central to understanding their effects. Our central result is that weight decay causally controls the turnover of global activation scale. In controlled continuations, removing decay near the peak allows this scale to keep rising, whereas retaining it produces decline even at constant learning rate. We develop a balance model for the rise and peak of massive-activation magnitude, in which AdamW-preconditioned growth opposes weight decay. Sweeping the decay coefficient λ shifts peak timing approximately log-linearly and yields peak magnitudes scaling approximately as λ-1/2, consistent with this balance. Optimizer measurements further show that preconditioning sustains the large-channel cohort against decay even when raw maintaining forces are too small to do so. Together, these findings connect the observed life cycle to scale-regulating training dynamics and establish weight decay as a training-time lever on activation magnitude.
