# NodeGround: A Node Classification Benchmark in the Graph Foundation Model Era

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39673 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39673/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 43 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 43)

- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10903/) (2017)
- [Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02216/) (2017)
- [Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02428/) (2019)
- [Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00687/) (2020)
- [Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.05868/) (2018)
- [Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRank](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.05997/) (2018)
- [Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.08861/) (2016)
- [Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02133/) (2020)
- [How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14491/) (2021)
- [Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05287/) (2020)
- [Image-based Recommendations on Styles and Substitutes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.04757/) (2015)
- [Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00982/) (2020)
- [GraphSAINT: Graph Sampling Based Inductive Learning Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.04931/) (2019)
- [Adaptive Universal Generalized PageRank Graph Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07988/) (2020)
- [Multi-scale Attributed Node Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13021/) (2019)
- [Beyond Low-frequency Information in Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00797/) (2021)
- [Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10510/) (2021)
- [A critical look at the evaluation of GNNs under heterophily: Are we really making progress?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11640/) (2023)
- [Deep Gaussian Embedding of Graphs: Unsupervised Inductive Learning via Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.03815/) (2017)
- [Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14446/) (2021)
- [Wiki-CS: A Wikipedia-Based Benchmark for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02901/) (2020)
- [A Fair Comparison of Graph Neural Networks for Graph Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09893/) (2019)
- [NodeFormer: A Scalable Graph Structure Learning Transformer for Node Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08385/) (2023)
- [Design Space for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.08843/) (2020)
- [TabArena: A Living Benchmark for Machine Learning on Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.16791/) (2025)
- [Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with Graph Convolutional Networks for Financial Forensics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02591/) (2019)
- [NAGphormer: A Tokenized Graph Transformer for Node Classification in Large Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04910/) (2022)
- [SGFormer: Simplifying and Empowering Transformers for Large-Graph Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10759/) (2023)
- [Characteristic Functions on Graphs: Birds of a Feather, from Statistical Descriptors to Parametric Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07959/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Can a pretrained graph model replace training and tuning a separate predictor for each dataset? Answering this requires evaluating prediction quality alongside computational cost. We present NodeGround, a node classification benchmark that puts graph foundation models (GFMs) and dataset-specific supervised learning under a common evaluation framework. The benchmark spans 51 datasets and evaluates six GFMs alongside 15 supervised methods under two label-availability regimes. Shared data partitions, validation-only model selection, controlled hyperparameter searches, and multiple predictive metrics make comparisons systematic, while workflow measurements account for adaptation, training, tuning, and inference. The results favor carefully tuned graph neural networks overall. GraphPFN reaches third place by Elo when more labels are available, yet its relative strengths vary substantially with dataset properties. Efficiency comparisons further qualify the benefits of pretrained reuse: GVT and GraphPFN appear on the Pareto frontiers when supervised methods are represented by their default and fully tuned configurations. Adding intermediate tuning budgets removes this advantage for GVT and leaves GraphPFN extending the estimated frontier in the label-rich setting alone. Thus, reusing pretrained parameters does not yet provide a broadly reliable route to either stronger predictions or cheaper workflows. We release the evaluation pipeline, run-level records, and an open leaderboard at https://github.com/nums-ai/nodeground.