# LEARN-TS: LLM-Enhanced Alignment and Reconstruction with Normality Guidance for Multivariate Time-Series Anomaly Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38789 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38789/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14730/) (2022)
- [TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02186/) (2022)
- [iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06625/) (2023)
- [Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01728/) (2023)
- [One Fits All:Power General Time Series Analysis by Pretrained LM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11939/) (2023)
- [Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04431/) (2018)
- [Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.02642/) (2021)
- [Are Language Models Actually Useful for Time Series Forecasting?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16964/) (2024)
- [CALF: Aligning LLMs for Time Series Forecasting via Cross-modal Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07300/) (2024)
- [Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of Time-series Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05257/) (2021)
- [Local Evaluation of Time Series Anomaly Detection Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.13167/) (2022)
- [Precision and Recall for Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03639/) (2018)
- [Towards a General Time Series Anomaly Detector with Adaptive Bottlenecks and Dual Adversarial Decoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15273/) (2024)
- [MEMTO: Memory-guided Transformer for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02530/) (2023)
- [LLM-Mixer: Multiscale Mixing in LLMs for Time Series Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11674/) (2024)
- [Towards Multimodal Time Series Anomaly Detection with Semantic Alignment and Condensed Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21612/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reconstruction errors in multivariate time-series anomaly detection may not reliably distinguish abnormal behavior from benign deviations. Language-derived semantics offer complementary context, but existing multimodal approaches may rely on time-associated paired textual information that is difficult to obtain consistently and is not provided by standard multivariate time-series anomaly detection benchmarks. This setting poses two challenges: (1) conditioning masked reconstruction on window-specific semantics without exposing exact numerical targets or anomaly-specific cues, and (2) using a window-independent concept of normality as a complementary semantic reference rather than an independent anomaly detector. We propose LLM-Enhanced Alignment and Reconstruction with Normality Guidance for Time Series (LEARN-TS), which uses a frozen language model to construct two role-separated semantic representations without requiring temporally paired external text. Window-specific observation semantics encode temporal and cross-variable context without exact numerical values to guide channel-shared patch-masked reconstruction. A fixed, dataset-agnostic normality prompt provides a window-independent semantic reference for aligning normal representations and estimating normality discrepancy. At inference, masking each temporal patch once yields timestamp-level reconstruction evidence, conditionally modulated by discrepancy from a separate unmasked view. Across four benchmarks, LEARN-TS achieves the highest mean performance in 13 of 16 dataset-metric comparisons. Controlled ablations examine observation conditioning, joint normality alignment and scoring, and reference content, showing dataset-dependent ranking benefits and modest average gains from semantic over random references.