# TALK-Dem: Benchmarking Embodied Task Planning under Dementia-Associated Communication Patterns

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38371 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38371/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00118/) (2024)
- [Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05608/) (2022)
- [AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05474/) (2017)
- [ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01734/) (2019)
- [LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11477/) (2023)
- [LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04088/) (2022)
- [Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Planners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01928/) (2023)
- [Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07166/) (2024)
- [DialFRED: Dialogue-Enabled Agents for Embodied Instruction Following](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13330/) (2022)
- [LoTa-Bench: Benchmarking Language-oriented Task Planners for Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08178/) (2024)
- [CLARA: Classifying and Disambiguating User Commands for Reliable Interactive Robotic Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10376/) (2023)
- [AmbiK: Dataset of Ambiguous Tasks in Kitchen Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04089/) (2025)
- [How Real Are Synthetic Therapy Conversations? Evaluating Fidelity in Prolonged Exposure Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.21800/) (2025)
- [TTSDS2: Resources and Benchmark for Evaluating Human-Quality Text to Speech Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19441/) (2025)
- [REI-Bench: Can Embodied Agents Understand Vague Human Instructions in Task Planning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10872/) (2025)
- [Dissecting Dissonance: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models Against Self-Contradictory Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01091/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Existing LLM-driven robot task planners rely on a taken-for-granted assumption of an ideal user whose instructions are clear, complete, and task-focused. However, when interacting with real-world users, especially those experiencing cognitive impairments, such as people living with dementia (PLWD), the planners often make mistakes and even pose physical safety risks. We proposed TALK-Dem (Talking Attributes and Linguistic Knowledge in Dementia), the first benchmark for evaluating LLM-driven robot task planning under dementia-associated verbal communication. TALK-Dem contains 4,800 instructions and covers five typical communication patterns, including Referential Imprecision, Object Substitution, Empty Speech, Topic Drift, and Intrusion, at three intensity levels. Experiments across six open-weight LLMs reveal a substantial robustness gap. Across communication patterns, open-weight models exhibited performance drops of up to 22.3 percentage points compared to ideal instructions. This revealed a critical gap and even danger for real-world applications, especially in assistive robotics, where locally deployable models are necessary due to privacy concerns and connectivity constraints. To mitigate this issue, we proposed the Context-Aware Retrieval from Experience (CARE) method, which retrieves relevant previously resolved tasks to provide task-specific interpretation and planning context. CARE generally outperformed standard prompting baselines across the six open-weight models, improving average task success by 18.1 percentage points over the vanilla prompt. These results highlighted the importance of both evaluating communication robustness and developing effective adaptation strategies for locally deployable assistive robots. The TALK-Dem dataset is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TALK-Dem-A6B3/.