# OpenCollab: A Multi-Agent Coding Framework with Programmable Collaboration and Controllable Runtime

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38345 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38345/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08155/) (2023)
- [MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00352/) (2023)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17760/) (2023)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21787/) (2024)
- [ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07924/) (2023)
- [Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13657/) (2025)
- [AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10848/) (2023)
- [Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11868/) (2026)
- [SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16941/) (2025)
- [Self-collaboration Code Generation via ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07590/) (2023)
- [More Agents Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05120/) (2024)
- [Rethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18272/) (2024)
- [Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17371/) (2023)
- [Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11977/) (2025)
- [DeepSWE: Measuring Frontier Coding Agents on Original, Long-Horizon Engineering Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07946/) (2026)
- [Stop Comparing LLM Agents Without Disclosing the Harness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23950/) (2026)
- [Single-Agent LLMs Outperform Multi-Agent Systems on Multi-Hop Reasoning Under Equal Thinking Token Budgets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02460/) (2026)
- [CooperBench: Why Coding Agents Cannot be Your Teammates Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.13295/) (2026)
- [Shepherd: Enabling Programmable Meta-Agents via Reversible Agentic Execution Traces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10913/) (2026)
- [TeamBench: Evaluating Agent Coordination under Enforced Role Separation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07073/) (2026)
- [Log analysis is necessary for credible evaluation of AI agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08545/) (2026)
- [Multi-agent Collaboration with State Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.20563/) (2026)
- [From Plan to Action: How Well Do Agents Follow the Plan?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12147/) (2026)
- [When Does Multi-Agent Collaboration Help? An Entropy Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04234/) (2026)
- [The Ringelmann Effect in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Scaling Law for Effective Team Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02646/) (2026)
- [When Agents Coordinate: Measuring Coordination in Multi-Agent AI Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.16801/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [SPROUT: Scaling Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Long-Horizon Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14405/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent coding systems are designed to tackle complex software engineering tasks through collaboration. However, existing evaluations typically assume configured organizations are followed faithfully, whereas reality differs. This behavioral gap, combined with differences in underlying system components, prevents clear attribution of observed gains. To this end, we introduce OpenCollab, a multi-agent coding framework that provides a unified infrastructure for programmable collaboration and controllable runtime. Specifically, OpenCollab unifies organization design, enforces experimental control on a shared runtime, and tracks execution through fine-grained event streams. On this basis, we define Adherence to quantify whether the declared organization is actually realized. Our experiments reveal that agents collaborate very differently across configurations: changing any single dimension shifts Adherence, from 47.2% to as high as 97.2%. Furthermore, extensive agentic coding benchmarks show that OpenCollab (Duo) establishes new SOTA performance compared to the mainstream harnesses such as Mini-SWE-agent, OpenHands, Codex CLI, and Claude Code, showing that a well-designed organization can outperform strong existing harnesses, while OpenCollab's single-agent configuration uses the fewest tokens across all evaluated suites. OpenCollab establishes a unified multi-agent infrastructure for easy programmable collaboration and controlled causal evaluation.