# Look Closer: Patch-wise Supervision for AI-Generated Image Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37937 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37937/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02357/) (2016)
- [CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.11035/) (2019)
- [Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10174/) (2023)
- [DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09295/) (2023)
- [GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08571/) (2023)
- [What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalize](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.10588/) (2020)
- [A Sanity Check for AI-generated Image Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19435/) (2024)
- [PatchCraft: Exploring Texture Patch for Efficient AI-generated Image Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12397/) (2023)
- [A Single Simple Patch is All You Need for AI-generated Image Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01123/) (2024)
- [Diffusion Facial Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15859/) (2024)
- [GenDet: Towards Good Generalizations for AI-Generated Image Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08880/) (2023)
- [All Patches Matter, More Patches Better: Enhance AI-Generated Image Detection via Panoptic Patch Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01396/) (2025)
- [EIB-Net: Entropy-Guided Information Bottleneck for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29064/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

How much of an image does a detector need to see? Small RGB regions can retain useful evidence of image synthesis even when they reveal little of the full scene. Motivated by single-patch detection, we study patch-wise supervision: a shared backbone classifies explicit crops, each crop receives its own loss, and patch probabilities are averaged only at inference. The procedure requires neither handcrafted residual filtering nor a learned image-level fusion module. Experiments span single-patch selection, multiple generator collections, and four CNN and Transformer backbones. On GenImage, the reported patch-wise variants improve average accuracy over their whole-image counterparts across all four backbones. Comparisons of supervision granularity, source resolution, crop size, and inference coverage further characterize the approach, while post-processing tests and difficult-image evaluation reveal its limitations. The historical experiments include evaluation-based model selection, so their scores are not presented as a uniformly selected leaderboard comparison. Overall, the study identifies explicit local input and patch-level supervision as a simple, useful combination for investigating generalizable AI-generated image detection.
