# Beyond Prompt Count: How Data Shapes Transfer in On-Policy Distillation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37377 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37377/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation.
- Builds on 33 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Knowledge distillation / [On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/on-policy-and-self-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05176/) (2025)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19348/) (2026)
- [On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13649/) (2023)
- [GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15763/) (2026)
- [LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04333/) (2024)
- [Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01456/) (2025)
- [Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13016/) (2026)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20571/) (2025)
- [DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11456/) (2025)
- [ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24864/) (2025)
- [Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Following](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02833/) (2025)
- [MiMo-V2-Flash Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02780/) (2026)
- [Light-R1: Curriculum SFT, DPO and RL for Long COT from Scratch and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10460/) (2025)
- [DistiLLM-2: A Contrastive Approach Boosts the Distillation of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07067/) (2025)
- [Scaling Reasoning Efficiently via Relaxed On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11137/) (2026)
- [Autoregressive Knowledge Distillation through Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07253/) (2020)
- [JustRL: Scaling a 1.5B LLM with a Simple RL Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.16649/) (2025)
- [MegaScience: Pushing the Frontiers of Post-Training Datasets for Science Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16812/) (2025)
- [Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models II: One Training Example](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.04172/) (2026)
- [STEPS: Selective On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10194/) (2026)
- [KAT-Coder-V2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.27703/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

On-policy distillation (OPD) trains students using teacher feedback on their own sampled responses, yet how prompt choice shapes transfer across teacher-student pairs remains poorly understood. We systematically study prompt quantity, source, and selection across RL- and SFT-continuation pairs and cross-model settings. We find that OPD can be highly prompt-efficient: a few prompts can approach large-pool performance, with four DAPO prompts matching the observed mathematics score of 3,840 DeepMath prompts. However, prompt utility is relational rather than intrinsic: changing only the teacher can reverse the relative effectiveness of mathematics and code prompts. To characterize these transfer differences, we analyze parameter and functional changes across prompt supports and model pairs. Functional alignment with the teacher varies across supports and target tasks; in continuation pairs, teacher-aligned prediction changes can coexist with weak parameter alignment. Continued OPD on effective supports can restore performance after unfavorable transfer. Finally, targeted selection does not consistently outperform uniform random sampling, and filtering out a source that performs poorly alone yields no consistent gain across three paired support draws. Overall, our results distinguish prompt efficiency from prompt interchangeability and show that effective data choice depends on the teacher-student pair and target capability, with random sampling providing a competitive baseline in the studied settings.