# Taming VLAs under Robot Execution Errors: Self-Compensation and Stress Testing

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37334 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37334/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Failure recovery and robustness, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models.
- Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Vision-language-action models / [Failure recovery and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/vla/failure-recovery-and-robustness/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15818/) (2023)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24164/) (2024)
- [π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16054/) (2025)
- [Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06907/) (2017)
- [Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12213/) (2024)
- [LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03310/) (2023)
- [GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14734/) (2025)
- [FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09747/) (2025)
- [RMA: Rapid Motor Adaptation for Legged Robots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.04034/) (2021)
- [TinyVLA: Towards Fast, Data-Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12514/) (2024)
- [GR-2: A Generative Video-Language-Action Model with Web-Scale Knowledge for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06158/) (2024)
- [Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.03201/) (2018)
- [Self-Supervised Policy Adaptation during Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04309/) (2020)
- [Run-time Observation Interventions Make Vision-Language-Action Models More Visually Robust](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01971/) (2024)
- [GEVRM: Goal-Expressive Video Generation Model For Robust Visual Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09268/) (2025)
- [RobustVLA: On Robustness of Vision-Language-Action Model against Multi-Modal Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00037/) (2025)
- [Eva-VLA: Evaluating Vision-Language-Action Models' Robustness Under Real-World Physical Variations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18953/) (2025)
- [EVOLVE-VLA: Test-Time Training from Environment Feedback for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14666/) (2025)
- [RobustVLA: Robustness-Aware Reinforcement Post-Training for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01331/) (2025)
- [On-the-Fly VLA Adaptation via Test-Time Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06748/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies often fail when a robot's executed motion deviates from their commanded action. Such execution errors arise from the robot's mechanics and operating conditions, such as wear and payload changes. We propose self-compensating VLA, a deployment-time adaptation method that enables a VLA policy to pre-compensate for the robot's execution errors when generating commands. Without task rewards or labels, it updates the policy online using the residual between the action commanded by a VLA and the motion executed by the robot. To stress-test VLA robustness across execution conditions that are impractical to cover with physical robots alone, we introduce RoboStress, a controlled simulation benchmark. It combines established joint-level models of friction, backlash, compliance, and gravity-compensation error into seven deployment scenarios whose execution errors depend on the robot's state and motion history. On RoboStress, self-compensating VLA achieves higher average task success than both the base policies and methods that build in robustness during training. On two physical robot arms with different usage histories, it raises the average task success rate by more than 30 percentage points on each arm, and the gains extend to objects not seen in the task demonstrations.