# Foundations of Proactive Agents: Principles, Technical Layers, and Proactivity-Gym

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37267 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37267/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 34 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [ReasoningBank: Scaling Agent Self-Evolving with Reasoning Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25140/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Open Research Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05563/) (2024)
- [Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and Non-collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13626/) (2023)
- [Proactive Agent: Shifting LLM Agents from Reactive Responses to Active Assistance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12361/) (2024)
- [CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12063/) (2024)
- [CORAL: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Evolution for Open-Ended Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01658/) (2026)
- [Towards Human-centered Proactive Conversational Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12670/) (2024)
- [ContextAgent: Context-Aware Proactive LLM Agents with Open-World Sensory Perceptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14668/) (2025)
- [Creating General User Models from Computer Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10831/) (2025)
- [Sleep-time Compute: Beyond Inference Scaling at Test-time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13171/) (2025)
- [KnowU-Bench: Towards Interactive, Proactive, and Personalized Mobile Agent Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08455/) (2026)
- [ProAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Proactive Assistance with Real-World Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04482/) (2026)
- [Proactive Agent Research Environment: Simulating Active Users to Evaluate Proactive Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00842/) (2026)
- [Intelligence per Watt: Measuring Intelligence Efficiency of Local AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07885/) (2025)
- [Agent.xpu: Efficient Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workloads on Heterogeneous SoC](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.24045/) (2025)
- [ProPerSim: Developing Proactive and Personalized AI Assistants through User-Assistant Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21730/) (2025)
- [Stochasticity in Agentic Evaluations: Quantifying Inconsistency with Intraclass Correlation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.06710/) (2025)
- [Beyond Reactivity: Measuring Proactive Problem Solving in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19771/) (2025)
- [ProactiveMobile: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Boosting Proactive Intelligence on Mobile Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.21858/) (2026)
- [π-Bench: Evaluating Proactive Personal Assistant Agents in Long-Horizon Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14678/) (2026)
- [ProactBench: Beyond What The User Asked For](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09228/) (2026)
- [Anticipate and Learn: Unleashing Idle-Time Compute in Proactive Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25971/) (2026)
- [Improving Proactive Dialog Agents Using Socially-Aware Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15359/) (2022)
- [Agentic Coding Needs Proactivity, Not Just Autonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06717/) (2026)
- [OpenJarvis: Personal AI, On Personal Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17172/) (2026)
- [ProActor: Timing-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Proactive Task Scheduling Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24900/) (2026)
- [VibeLifeBench: Can Your Life Agent Be Proactive and Persistent in a Living World?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.10875/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Proactive LLM agents can turn idle compute into useful support before users ask. Yet even correct work can misread user context, impose review costs, or undermine trust. This work proposes foundations for designing, realizing, and evaluating proactive LLM agents around three joint principles (3T): Task Capability, anticipating relevant needs and correctly performing useful work; Temporal Allocation, allocating compute according to resource availability and when results are needed; and Trust, sustaining users' confidence and appropriate reliance on the agent. We connect these objectives to a design space organized around five dimensions: task scope, anticipation horizon, activation trigger, processing timing, and intervention depth, and specify the situation and system modeling needed to support its choices, including user and environment representations, backbone LLMs, and agent harnesses. Lastly, we propose PROACTIVITY-GYM, a simulation-based evaluation testbed including multi-day scenarios, stateful environments, and persona-conditioned simulated users that can evaluate the consequences of proactive assistance across interactions. Evaluations across 23 model-harness configurations uncover substantial performance gaps across 3T and reveal that LLM judges often conflate task capability and trust. A human study with 30 participants demonstrates the importance of the joint 3T optimization: participants show sharp trust declines after intervention misalignment despite correct outcomes, and prefer sleep-time assistance, even when imperfect, to preserve ongoing focus. Together, these findings support designing and evaluating proactive agents through the joint consideration of useful work, compute allocation, and evolving user trust.