# Beyond Readability: Evaluating Task Information Recoverability

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36957 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36957/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05918/) (2021)
- [OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00067/) (2019)
- [Real-ESRGAN: Training Real-World Blind Super-Resolution with Pure Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10833/) (2021)
- [A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01718/) (2022)
- [Activating More Pixels in Image Super-Resolution Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.04437/) (2022)
- [Can Pre-trained Vision and Language Models Answer Visual Information-Seeking Questions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11713/) (2023)
- [Open-domain Visual Entity Recognition: Towards Recognizing Millions of Wikipedia Entities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11154/) (2023)
- [Encyclopedic VQA: Visual questions about detailed properties of fine-grained categories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09224/) (2023)
- [Scene Text Image Super-Resolution in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03341/) (2020)
- [Restore Text First, Enhance Image Later: Two-Stage Scene Text Image Super-Resolution with Glyph Structure Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21590/) (2025)
- [WikiCLIP: An Efficient Contrastive Baseline for Open-domain Visual Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.09921/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Direct visual readability and task-information recoverability are different quantities. Failure to decode a target from a fixed observation need not eliminate access to that target through another recovery route. We develop an evaluation perspective that makes the observation, query, target, and available knowledge explicit and measures the overlap between routes' success sets. For information available on the original visible surface under suitable imaging conditions, direct optical recovery reads the target from the image, optionally after restoration; entity-linked recovery uses residual visual evidence to identify the depicted entity and accesses its target through an entity--attribute relation in a specified knowledge resource. Such access can draw on stored knowledge or an external source. A controlled book-cover study instantiates external access with a fixed title--author catalog, comparing optical author recovery with visual title resolution and deterministic lookup under resolution degradation. Entity-linked successes persist across the tested vision--language models, revealing information access beyond the tested direct visual frontier despite substantial differences in absolute performance. A substantial optical-only region remains. These complementary outcomes show why visual degradation should be evaluated through the task information accessible along specified routes and knowledge resources, alongside direct readability.
