# Backpropagated Output Momentum: Relocating Optimizer History from Parameters to Task Space

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36738 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36738/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17557/) (2024)
- [Riemannian Adaptive Optimization Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00760/) (2018)
- [Adam-mini: Use Fewer Learning Rates To Gain More](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16793/) (2024)
- [A Kaczmarz-inspired approach to accelerate the optimization of neural network wavefunctions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10190/) (2024)
- [M+Adam: Low-Precision Training via Additive-Multiplicative Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.10611/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Optimizer momentum is usually stored as a parameter-sized moving average of past gradients, which makes history costly and fixes each past signal in the coordinates in which it was computed. We introduce Backpropagated Output Momentum (BOM), which instead stores a compact moving average of prediction errors at the model output and reprojects that history through the current network at every step. A batch-level analysis characterizes the information retained and omitted by this relocation, while the implementation preserves the current supervised gradient and can replace the first-moment component of several adaptive optimizers. As a plug-in for momentum-based optimizers, including ones that already compress their state, BOM reduces parameter-shaped optimizer state by 49.7-99.8% in three compositions and, averaged over three language backbones, paired step time by 4.0%. It also improves mean validation performance across language and vision fine-tuning, by 1.42 points in the primary five-task comparison. Language and vision pretraining studies, together with matched mechanism controls, further test the construction across output spaces and model scales.
