# InterBias-SV: Compound Conditions in Speaker Verification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36500 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36500/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07447/) (2021)
- [WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13900/) (2021)
- [Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.06670/) (2019)
- [VoxCeleb2: Deep Speaker Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05622/) (2018)
- [VoxCeleb: a large-scale speaker identification dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.08612/) (2017)
- [SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.01051/) (2021)
- [ECAPA-TDNN: Emphasized Channel Attention, Propagation and Aggregation in TDNN Based Speaker Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07143/) (2020)
- [SpeechBrain: A General-Purpose Speech Toolkit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04624/) (2021)
- [E2 TTS: Embarrassingly Easy Fully Non-Autoregressive Zero-Shot TTS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18009/) (2024)
- [VoiceCraft: Zero-Shot Speech Editing and Text-to-Speech in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16973/) (2024)
- [CAM++: A Fast and Efficient Network for Speaker Verification Using Context-Aware Masking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00332/) (2023)
- [Wespeaker: A Research and Production oriented Speaker Embedding Learning Toolkit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17016/) (2022)
- [FreeVC: Towards High-Quality Text-Free One-Shot Voice Conversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15418/) (2022)
- [Voice Conversion With Just Nearest Neighbors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18975/) (2023)
- [EARS: An Anechoic Fullband Speech Dataset Benchmarked for Speech Enhancement and Dereverberation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06185/) (2024)
- [TitaNet: Neural Model for speaker representation with 1D Depth-wise separable convolutions and global context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04410/) (2021)
- [Pushing the limits of raw waveform speaker recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.08488/) (2022)
- [UniSpeech-SAT: Universal Speech Representation Learning with Speaker Aware Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05752/) (2021)
- [Reshape Dimensions Network for Speaker Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18223/) (2024)
- [Bias in Automated Speaker Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.09486/) (2022)
- [The VoxCeleb Speaker Recognition Challenge: A Retrospective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14886/) (2024)
- [To train or not to train adversarially: A study of bias mitigation strategies for speaker recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.09122/) (2022)
- [SVeritas: Benchmark for Robust Speaker Verification under Diverse Conditions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17091/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Speaker verification systems encounter combinations of noise, channel distortion, and changes in speech. Evaluating each condition separately does not establish whether their effects add. InterBias-SV organises this question around a four-term comparison: joint error, two marginal errors, and a common reference. Its results artefact contains 4,068 scored records across 17 experiments, 12 encoder labels, and six speech corpora, totalling 12 million trial evaluations. Three experiment families contain the same-corpus terms needed to compute additive contrasts. For labels assigned to speaker-trained encoders, their mean contrasts are +0.0026, +0.0088, and +0.0024 in equal error rate (EER), with larger variation across settings. These descriptive averages do not establish equivalence to additivity: trial matching, checkpoint identity, and parts of the condition metadata remain unverified. We also examine two interpretation problems. Near-chance EER can make additive predictions difficult to interpret, but chance performance is not a hard EER ceiling, and correlation with the prediction does not identify a saturation mechanism. Ratios of demographic gaps are unstable when their clean reference is near zero; absolute gaps provide a more direct summary. The benchmark provides condition definitions, analysis scripts, and explicit requirements for interpretable compound-condition comparisons, while separating recomputable summaries from claims that require further experimental validation.