# Uncertainty Quantification in Cardiac Model Personalisation from Ultrafast Ultrasound

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35214 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35214/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [The frontier of simulation-based inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.01429/) (2019)
- [sbi reloaded: a toolkit for simulation-based inference workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17337/) (2024)
- [Simulation-based Inference for Cardiovascular Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13918/) (2023)
- [Leveraging Cardiovascular Simulations for In-Vivo Prediction of Cardiac Biomarkers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17542/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Cardiac model personalisation requires inferring mechanical parameters that are not directly measurable in vivo. Ultrafast ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) enables non-invasive tracking of myocardial stiffness dynamics over the cardiac cycle, providing a target for personalisation. However, mapping these observations to subject specific model parameters remains ill-posed, as multiple parameter sets can reproduce the same stiffness dynamics. We formulate SWE-informed personalisation as a statistical inference problem using simulation-based inference (SBI). Using a subject-adapted 0D cardiovascular model and neural posterior estimation, we estimate model-conditional posterior distributions over active stiffness scale k0, contraction rate kATP, and relaxation rate kSR, conditioned on SWE-derived curve features and subject specific context. Among six healthy volunteers, four passed objective prior-support diagnostics and were retained for quantitative posterior analysis. Curve-level RMSE against the observed SWE target decreased from 12.61 ± 5.55 kPa for the prior predictive median to 1.14 ± 0.38 kPa for the posterior predictive median, an 89.7 ± 4.2% reduction. Posterior analysis revealed parameter-specific uncertainty, k0-kATP compensation, weaker constraint of kSR, and the importance of prior-predictive diagnostics for assessing whether each subject is represented within the modelled SWE feature space. These results support SBI for uncertainty aware SWE-based personalisation, while identifying prior support and forward-model adequacy as key diagnostics.
