# Depot-Closed Multi-Component Construction for Neural Vehicle Routing

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35066 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35066/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Pointer Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03134/) (2015)
- [Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08475/) (2018)
- [Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizon](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.06128/) (2018)
- [Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09940/) (2016)
- [POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.16011/) (2020)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04240/) (2018)
- [Combinatorial optimization and reasoning with graph neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09544/) (2021)
- [DIFUSCO: Graph-based Diffusion Solvers for Combinatorial Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08224/) (2023)
- [Learning to Perform Local Rewriting for Combinatorial Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00337/) (2018)
- [Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Heavy Decoder: Toward Large Scale Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07985/) (2023)
- [Hybrid Genetic Search for the CVRP: Open-Source Implementation and SWAP* Neighborhood](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10384/) (2020)
- [Sym-NCO: Leveraging Symmetricity for Neural Combinatorial Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13209/) (2022)
- [Learning to Delegate for Large-scale Vehicle Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.04139/) (2021)
- [Learning to Iteratively Solve Routing Problems with Dual-Aspect Collaborative Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.02544/) (2021)
- [Multi-Decoder Attention Model with Embedding Glimpse for Solving Vehicle Routing Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10638/) (2020)
- [Efficient Active Search for Combinatorial Optimization Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05126/) (2021)
- [BQ-NCO: Bisimulation Quotienting for Efficient Neural Combinatorial Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.03313/) (2023)
- [Learning to Search Feasible and Infeasible Regions of Routing Problems with Flexible Neural k-Opt](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18264/) (2023)
- [MVMoE: Multi-Task Vehicle Routing Solver with Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01029/) (2024)
- [Towards Omni-generalizable Neural Methods for Vehicle Routing Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19587/) (2023)
- [Towards Generalizable Neural Solvers for Vehicle Routing Problems via Ensemble with Transferrable Local Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14104/) (2023)
- [RouteFinder: Towards Foundation Models for Vehicle Routing Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15007/) (2024)
- [Multi-Task Learning for Routing Problem with Cross-Problem Zero-Shot Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16891/) (2024)
- [INViT: A Generalizable Routing Problem Solver with Invariant Nested View Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02317/) (2024)
- [Rethinking Light Decoder-based Solvers for Vehicle Routing Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00753/) (2025)
- [Learning to Solve Vehicle Routing Problems with Time Windows through Joint Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09100/) (2020)
- [Neural Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms for Solving Vehicle Routing Problems: A Comprehensive Survey with Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00415/) (2024)
- [Destroy and Repair Using Hyper Graphs for Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16170/) (2025)
- [Learning to Insert for Constructive Neural Vehicle Routing Solver](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13904/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Most neural constructive solvers for the vehicle routing problem (VRP) use route-by-route construction, extending one route until completion before starting the next. This commits route membership early and hinders global coordination across routes. We propose multi-component construction, which maintains many route components simultaneously and merges them in an arbitrary order. This removes the depot-return cue that route-by-route construction obtains from the remaining capacity; to compensate, we introduce an interpretation in which every component is treated as an implicitly depot-closed route. Under this depot-closed interpretation, every intermediate state of standard CVRP construction is a complete feasible solution, and the exact cost reduction of a merge is the Clarke-Wright saving. The neural policy combines this CW-saving signal with the evolving component state to learn what to connect and when to connect. A policy trained only on CVRP100 outperforms the reported results of representative neural solvers on CVRP100-500 with greedy inference and, reused for ruin-and-reconstruct, performs strongly at all evaluated sizes up to CVRP1000. In a zero-shot Constraint Tightness evaluation with capacities from C=10 to 500, it outperforms the reported neural solvers at every capacity. Controlled analyses show that robustness persists without CW grounding and point to learned route-closing behavior as a plausible contributor to the tight-regime degradation of learned route-by-route solvers.