# After the Fix: Transfer of Corrected Agent Experience

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34603 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34603/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10144/) (2023)
- [LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06120/) (2025)
- [Agent Workflow Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07429/) (2024)
- [SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12670/) (2026)
- [LLMLingua: Compressing Prompts for Accelerated Inference of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05736/) (2023)
- [ReasoningBank: Scaling Agent Self-Evolving with Reasoning Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25140/) (2025)
- [Trace2Skill: Distill Trajectory-Local Lessons into Transferable Agent Skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25158/) (2026)
- [CLIN: A Continually Learning Language Agent for Rapid Task Adaptation and Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10134/) (2023)
- [MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16313/) (2026)
- [The Complexity Trap: Simple Observation Masking Is as Efficient as LLM Summarization for Agent Context Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21433/) (2025)
- [APEX-Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14242/) (2026)
- [Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11988/) (2026)
- [How Reliable is Language Model Micro-Benchmarking?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08730/) (2025)
- [One Success Isn't Reliability: Thinkingbox, a Sandbox and Benchmark for Agents in Stateful Business Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.19741/) (2026)
- [Break It Down, Pass It On: Cross-Task Skill Transfer in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20274/) (2026)
- [Trace as State: Reasoning Traces as Conditional States for Long-Context Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.02702/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Does repairing an episode make its experience a better memory for the next task? We transfer the same failed source before and after accepted repair to a fixed target, alongside independent execution. Our 3,300 runs cover 100 ThinkingBox pairs and the same 100 APEX pairs with and without source-state inheritance, under eleven conditions. ThinkingBox's Full/Skill/Hybrid correction gains are 44/29/32 percentage points, with corrected performance 25/22/18 points above independence; inference weakens at the task-family level. Yet 12 of Full's 15-point larger correction gap over Skill come from worse uncorrected performance, not better corrected memory. Moreover, 22 of Full's 46 upward transitions restore observed baseline success. Neither APEX regime establishes comparable aggregate correction benefits. Action evidence connects workflow gains with reusable obligations and convention conflicts with source-local choices. Text APEX's accepted execution reaches 52% versus its summary's 40%, without robust global/group-level superiority or an estab- lished advantage over independence. Smaller handoffs reduce input but increase calls. The value of repairing experience is therefore distinct from the value of reusing it: memory updates require both a previous-version reference and a fresh-start reference.