# Behavioral Monitoring of JEPA World Models with Jacobian Centroids

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33940 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33940/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [Latent predictive world models](https://mlsanity.com/wm/latent-predictive-world-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04137/) (2023)
- [D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07219/) (2020)
- [Toy Models of Superposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10652/) (2022)
- [DeepMind Control Suite](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.00690/) (2018)
- [A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07511/) (2021)
- [The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03658/) (2023)
- [Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04093/) (2024)
- [TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16828/) (2023)
- [DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04983/) (2024)
- [LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19312/) (2026)
- [Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29358/) (2026)
- [Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14819/) (2025)
- [The Geometry of Deep Networks: Power Diagram Subdivision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.08443/) (2019)
- [Temporal Straightening for Latent Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.12231/) (2026)
- [Uncertainty-aware Latent Safety Filters for Avoiding Out-of-Distribution Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00779/) (2025)
- [Foundational World Models Accurately Detect Bimanual Manipulator Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06987/) (2026)
- [The Linear Centroids Hypothesis: Features as Directions Learned by Local Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11962/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting failures in World Model (WM)-based planning requires monitoring whether the model is behaviorally aligned with the current task, which in turn requires studying its internal representations. Here, we show that centroids---sub-component Jacobian row-sums---effectively identify the behavioral properties of WMs, complementing traditional activation-based knowledge signals. The centroids of a model are easily computed through Jacobian vector products and characterize how the model organizes the geometry of its input space, yielding an efficient perspective on internal representations, including the generation of task-relevant saliency maps. Evaluated on continuous control tasks using JEPA WMs, this behavioral view reveals a structural dissociation, where the encoder correctly represents the goal while the predictor remains behaviorally unresponsive. This failure mode directly predicts planning failure before any action is taken, allowing for goal resampling to recapture out-of-distribution success. Moreover, centroid-based methods outperform baseline methods as distribution-shift detectors. Together, these tools yield a behavioral monitoring stack that is operational and consequential under distribution shifts.