# MISHAP-Bench: A Hallucination Benchmark for Large Audio-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33893 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33893/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 36 of its 66 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04356/) (2022)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.06670/) (2019)
- [FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14251/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20215/) (2025)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16922/) (2023)
- [Qwen2-Audio Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10759/) (2024)
- [SALMONN: Towards Generic Hearing Abilities for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13289/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-Omni Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17765/) (2025)
- [DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03883/) (2023)
- [Clotho: An Audio Captioning Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09387/) (2019)
- [FSD50K: An Open Dataset of Human-Labeled Sound Events](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00475/) (2020)
- [HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11747/) (2023)
- [Kimi-Audio Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18425/) (2025)
- [AIR-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models via Generative Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07729/) (2024)
- [Audio Flamingo 3: Advancing Audio Intelligence with Fully Open Large Audio Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08128/) (2025)
- [VoiceBench: Benchmarking LLM-Based Voice Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17196/) (2024)
- [AudioBench: A Universal Benchmark for Audio Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16020/) (2024)
- [Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18370/) (2024)
- [MuLan: A Joint Embedding of Music Audio and Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12415/) (2022)
- [The Song Describer Dataset: a Corpus of Audio Captions for Music-and-Language Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10057/) (2023)
- [MiMo-Audio: Audio Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.23808/) (2025)
- [AVHBench: A Cross-Modal Hallucination Benchmark for Audio-Visual Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18325/) (2024)
- [CompA: Addressing the Gap in Compositional Reasoning in Audio-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08753/) (2023)
- [Towards Holistic Evaluation of Large Audio-Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15957/) (2025)
- [Understanding Sounds, Missing the Questions: The Challenge of Object Hallucination in Large Audio-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08402/) (2024)
- [Can Large Audio-Language Models Truly Hear? Tackling Hallucinations with Multi-Task Assessment and Stepwise Audio Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16130/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large audio-language models (LALMs) produce fluent responses about audio but often hallucinate by making plausible yet ungrounded claims. Existing audio hallucination benchmarks mainly measure response correctness, leaving it unclear whether an LALM hallucinates or simply fails to understand the audio. We challenge correctness-based evaluation by defining two hallucination categories: (i) context, where claims are not grounded in the audio; and (ii) knowledge, where claims about audio-related topics lack support from externally verifiable facts. We introduce MISHAP-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark with 12,000 challenging open-ended question-audio pairs and a rigorous evaluation pipeline covering both categories. To evaluate open-ended responses, we propose a groundedness judge that uses reference rubrics and judge prompts guided by human annotations. We extensively evaluate ten state-of-the-art LALMs and show that hallucination remains substantial. Even a frontier model such as Gemini 3.7 Flash reaches a hallucination rate of 36.5%. We further adapt and benchmark four mitigation methods from multiple domains for LALMs. Despite some improvements, effective hallucination mitigation remains an open challenge. Finally, we call on the community to evaluate hallucination and benchmark mitigation methods with MISHAP-Bench.