# DynamicDx: Evaluating Evidence Acquisition in Video-Based Diagnosis

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32957 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32957/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.13138/) (2022)
- [Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21075/) (2024)
- [TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00476/) (2024)
- [Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00377/) (2017)
- [Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medicine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13178/) (2024)
- [Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18416/) (2024)
- [Revisiting the "Video" in Video-Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01720/) (2022)
- [Adaptive Keyframe Sampling for Long Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21271/) (2025)
- [MDAgents: An Adaptive Collaboration of LLMs for Medical Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15155/) (2024)
- [MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00922/) (2024)
- [AdaFrame: Adaptive Frame Selection for Fast Video Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12432/) (2018)
- [Towards Accurate Differential Diagnosis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00164/) (2023)
- [RULE: Reliable Multimodal RAG for Factuality in Medical Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05131/) (2024)
- [Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Medicine with Iterative Follow-up Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00727/) (2024)
- [Generative Frame Sampler for Long Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09146/) (2025)
- [Medical Adaptation of Large Language and Vision-Language Models: Are We Making Progress?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04118/) (2024)
- [A Dataset for Medical Instructional Video Classification and Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12888/) (2022)
- [Advancing Conversational Diagnostic AI with Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04653/) (2025)
- [Deep Learning Approaches for Seizure Video Analysis: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10930/) (2023)
- [Towards Conversational Medical AI with Eyes, Ears and a Voice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09272/) (2026)
- [DeepArrhythmia: Segment-Contextualized ECG Arrhythmia Classification via Selective Evidence Acquisition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16441/) (2026)
- [Peak-Detector: Explainable Peak Detection via Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models in Physiological Sign](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16452/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Diagnosing a patient from video requires more than recognizing the sign: a vision-language model must turn what it sees into hypotheses, questions and tests. DynamicDx evaluates each step in 71 neurological consultations across 11 sign categories, linking authentic patient videos to confirmed diagnoses and fixed charts built from the same case reports, so that every model queries the same evidence. Across five such models, video improves accuracy by 9.9-22.5 percentage points over blind input, but neither recognition alone nor temporal order explains the gain: the cause is usually missing from the model's video-only differential diagnosis even when the sign is recognized, and shuffling the frames produces no reliable accuracy loss. Instead, a trajectory replay traces most of the gain to the investigation results the video prompts. Evidence acquisition is the bottleneck: supplying the decisive investigations raises accuracy to 73.2-93.0%. Two interventions act on it. A post-trained 4B video describer improves sign descriptions, especially from a short, densely sampled segment, and source-clean literature retrieval expands initial hypotheses; both bring the tests a model orders closer to those the treating clinicians documented and, through them, raise accuracy. For video-based diagnosis, seeing better helps when it leads to asking better.
