# Generative Priors Conditioned on Natural Language for Bayesian Inversion in PDEs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32941 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32941/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 53 of its 86 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06125/) (2022)
- [Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11487/) (2022)
- [Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00667/) (2022)
- [Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08895/) (2020)
- [FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.07871/) (2017)
- [Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14687/) (2022)
- [Denoising Diffusion Restoration Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11793/) (2022)
- [Fast Sampling of Diffusion Models with Exponential Integrator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.13902/) (2022)
- [Solving Inverse Problems in Medical Imaging with Score-Based Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08005/) (2021)
- [Pyro: Deep Universal Probabilistic Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.09538/) (2018)
- [Wasserstein Auto-Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.01558/) (2017)
- [Learning a Variational Network for Reconstruction of Accelerated MRI Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00447/) (2017)
- [Compressed Sensing using Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.03208/) (2017)
- [Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17775/) (2023)
- [A Variational Perspective on Solving Inverse Problems with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04391/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00083/) (2024)
- [A Physics-informed Diffusion Model for High-fidelity Flow Field Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14680/) (2022)
- [Decomposed Diffusion Sampler for Accelerating Large-Scale Inverse Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05754/) (2023)
- [Score-Based Diffusion Models as Principled Priors for Inverse Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11751/) (2023)
- [DiffusionPDE: Generative PDE-Solving Under Partial Observation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17763/) (2024)
- [Score-based Data Assimilation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10574/) (2023)
- [Physics-Informed Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14404/) (2024)
- [Prompt-tuning latent diffusion models for inverse problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01110/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Inferring quantities of interest (QoI) from data is a central task in Science and Engineering. In such contexts, we often have access to both quantitative data and qualitative data. Quantitative data may be represented by noisy sensor measurements, simulation data, re-analysis data; qualitative data may be in the form of text descriptions of experimental setups, expected experiment outcomes, and human-perceived system behaviours. The task we address in this paper is the following. Given a training set of paired qualitative text and quantitative QoI data, we learn to exploit the inherent correlation between the two modalities to learn a highly informative data-driven natural-language-conditional Bayesian prior, such that when presented with a new physical system, we can coherently combine (i) the training dataset, (ii) qualitative text describing the new system, and (iii) a small number of noisy sensor readings from that new system, to perform inference and uncertainty quantification (UQ) over the QoI. To achieve this task, we develop two parallel approaches, one uses conditional diffusion and the other conditional autoencoders, and compare both against classical Bayesian methodology, unconditional generative models and deterministic supervised methods. Each approach has specific strengths and tradeoffs; conditional autoencoder offers theoretical tractability, allows for fast posterior sampling, and provides better-calibrated UQ, whereas conditional diffusion is explored for greater expressiveness and capturing complex posteriors with irregular QoI fields. The approach is tested on the steady-state heat equation, damped Helmholtz equation, and UK weather reanalysis data.