# Derivative-Informed Training of Neural Operators On-the-Fly via Sketched Tangent Consistency

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32797 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32797/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08895/) (2020)
- [DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03193/) (2019)
- [Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03485/) (2020)
- [Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01050/) (2021)
- [When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14527/) (2020)
- [Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10974/) (2021)
- [Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.03794/) (2021)
- [Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09535/) (2020)
- [Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebra](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.4357/) (2014)
- [Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04626/) (2021)
- [Multiwavelet-based Operator Learning for Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13459/) (2021)
- [Sobolev Training for Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04859/) (2017)
- [Fourier-DeepONet: Fourier-enhanced deep operator networks for full waveform inversion with improved accuracy, generalizability, and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17289/) (2023)
- [Derivative-Informed Neural Operator: An Efficient Framework for High-Dimensional Parametric Derivative Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10745/) (2022)
- [An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05801/) (2023)
- [Sensitivity-Constrained Fourier Neural Operators for Forward and Inverse Problems in Parametric Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08740/) (2025)
- [Sobolev Acceleration and Statistical Optimality for Learning Elliptic Equations via Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07331/) (2022)
- [Derivative-Informed Fourier Neural Operator: Universal Approximation and Applications to PDE-Constrained Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14086/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Derivative-informed training improves neural operators by directly supervising their input-output sensitivities, which is crucial when neural operators are used as differentiable surrogates for inverse problems, PDE-constrained optimization, design, and control. However, existing methods rely on offline-generated derivative labels, making data generation slow, storage-intensive, and difficult to adapt across datasets, resolutions, or perturbation bases. We propose sketched tangent consistency loss (sTCL), an on-the-fly derivative-informed training objective that, for PDEs with a known and differentiable residual, enforces sensitivity consistency directly from the governing equation without offline tangent labels or neural-operator architecture changes. sTCL uses randomly sketched input perturbations to provide a lightweight derivative-level physics constraint during training. However, raw forward-sensitivity residual penalties can fail for stiff, ill-conditioned, indefinite, or coupled saddle-point tangent operators. To address this, we introduce lightweight operator-aware loss-conditioning mechanisms selected by a simple tangent-operator decision rule. Across Helmholtz, nonlinear diffusion-reaction, Burgers, Allen-Cahn, and Navier-Stokes, with the same neural-operator backbone for all methods, the PDE-specific sTCL losses achieve solution and Jacobian accuracy comparable to offline derivative-informed training (DIFNO) while eliminating the offline derivative-data generation and storage pipeline. These results show that on-the-fly derivative-informed training need not merely amortize offline tangent-solve cost into training; with appropriate sketching and loss design, sTCL provides an effective drop-in path to derivative-informed neural operators. Code is available at https://github.com/yang9579/Derivative-informed-traning-on-the-fly.
