# Rethinking Training-Inference Mismatch in LLM Reinforcement Learning: Where It Arises and How to Correct It

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32444 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32444/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 28 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04434/) (2024)
- [IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01561/) (2018)
- [Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07191/) (2021)
- [Group Sequence Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18071/) (2025)
- [MiniMax-M1: Scaling Test-Time Compute Efficiently with Lightning Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13585/) (2025)
- [AReaL: A Large-Scale Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24298/) (2025)
- [Stabilizing MoE Reinforcement Learning by Aligning Training and Inference Routers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11370/) (2025)
- [Defeating the Training-Inference Mismatch via FP16](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26788/) (2025)
- [Every Step Evolves: Scaling Reinforcement Learning for Trillion-Scale Thinking Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18855/) (2025)
- [Policy Optimization via Importance Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.06098/) (2018)
- [Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.01374/) (2025)
- [Trust Region Masking for Long-Horizon LLM Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.23075/) (2025)
- [Beyond Precision: Training-Inference Mismatch is an Optimization Problem and Simple LR Scheduling Fixes It](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01826/) (2026)
- [Towards Stable and Effective Reinforcement Learning for Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23027/) (2025)
- [Ling and Ring 2.6 Technical Report: Efficient and Instant Agentic Intelligence at Trillion-Parameter Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15079/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We study training-inference mismatch in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for large language models, where rollouts are sampled by an inference engine while gradients are computed by a training engine, and the two engines assign different probabilities to the same tokens. To account for this discrepancy in policy updates, we introduce calibrated importance sampling (CIS). CIS is motivated by an empirically supported logit-displacement characterization that expresses the mismatch as an additive displacement varepsilont in log-odds, determined by the per-logit perturbation before the softmax, whose distribution is approximately invariant to token confidence. This characterization motivates a confidence-aware truncation: large positive displacements are truncated at a single constant threshold, which maps back to an importance-ratio cap that tightens as token confidence increases. Theoretically, we show that CIS replaces the unbounded second moment that governs the error of exact importance sampling with a term bounded by a constant, at the cost of a bias controlled by the truncated excess. In evaluation across three mixture-of-experts models and five mathematical reasoning benchmarks, CIS achieves the highest five-benchmark average on all three models among the evaluated baselines. Diagnostic analyses show that CIS places less truncation bias on low-confidence tokens than truncated importance sampling, while upward clipping of small importance weights reduces held-out accuracy.