# ConflictVLA-Bench: Benchmarking Behavioral Responses of Vision-Language-Action Models to Premise Conflicts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31792 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.31792/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Failure recovery and robustness, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models.
- Builds on 29 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Vision-language-action models / [Failure recovery and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/vla/failure-recovery-and-robustness/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15818/) (2023)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24164/) (2024)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16054/) (2025)
- [LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03310/) (2023)
- [GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14734/) (2025)
- [Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05608/) (2022)
- [Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Success](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19645/) (2025)
- [RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12271/) (2019)
- [FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09747/) (2025)
- [CALVIN: A Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03227/) (2021)
- [UniVLA: Learning to Act Anywhere with Task-centric Latent Actions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06111/) (2025)
- [RoboCasa: Large-Scale Simulation of Everyday Tasks for Generalist Robots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02523/) (2024)
- [Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Planners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01928/) (2023)
- [LIBERO-Plus: In-depth Robustness Analysis of Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13626/) (2025)
- [LIBERO-PRO: Towards Robust and Fair Evaluation of Vision-Language-Action Models Beyond Memorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03827/) (2025)
- [VLA-JEPA: Enhancing Vision-Language-Action Model with Latent World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10098/) (2026)
- [SafeVLA: Towards Safety Alignment of Vision-Language-Action Model via Constrained Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.03480/) (2025)
- [VLA-Arena: An Open-Source Framework for Benchmarking Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.22539/) (2025)
- [CLARA: Classifying and Disambiguating User Commands for Reliable Interactive Robotic Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10376/) (2023)
- [When Vision Overrides Language: Evaluating and Mitigating Counterfactual Failures in VLAs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.17659/) (2026)
- [VLA-Trace: Diagnosing Vision-Language-Action Models through Representation and Behavior Tracing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30117/) (2026)
- [Restoring Linguistic Grounding in VLA Models via Train-Free Attention Recalibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06001/) (2026)
- [SafeVLA-Bench: A Benchmark for the Success-Safety Gap in Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00773/) (2026)
- [Don't Take the Premise for Granted: Evaluating the Premise Critique Ability of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23715/) (2025)
- [HazardArena: Evaluating Semantic Safety in Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12447/) (2026)
- [Do What? Teaching Vision-Language-Action Models to Reject the Impossible](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16292/) (2025)
- [The Yes-Man Syndrome: Benchmarking Abstention in Embodied Robotic Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.20544/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models perform strongly on manipulation tasks, their responses to invalid task premises remain underexplored. Existing evaluations of premise conflicts often focus on terminal task outcomes, yet task failure alone cannot distinguish behavioral disengagement from continued pursuit followed by an execution error. We call the latter pattern Failed Persistence. To study this phenomenon, we introduce ConflictVLA-Bench, which pairs conflict rollouts with premise-consistent reference rollouts and evaluates both outcomes and execution processes. Built on LIBERO, the benchmark contains 2,826 prompt-conditioned conflict tasks spanning four conflict families, four structural configurations, and two prompt conditions. Across all eight VLAs, invalid premises reduce original goal completion by at least 17.3 percentage points, with the reduction reaching 56.2 percentage points for OpenVLA. Crucially, even when models succeed on premise-consistent tasks and fail on their matched conflict tasks, they often continue to approach the original targets, retain early trajectory structure, and show limited action magnitude suppression. Failed Persistence therefore recurs across the evaluated models. Explicit premise checking does not consistently produce selective and coordinated behavioral changes. These findings show that terminal failure alone establishes neither behavioral disengagement nor refusal and that outcomes alone are insufficient for VLA evaluation. Experimental data and additional details are available on the project page: https://github.com/EmbodiedAISurvey/ConflictVLA-Bench