# Generalization behavior of OPTQ and the role of regularization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31560 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.31560/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05877/) (2017)
- [QuIP: 2-Bit Quantization of Large Language Models With Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13304/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Evaluation of Quantization Strategies for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16775/) (2024)
- [Qronos: Correcting the Past by Shaping the Future... in Post-Training Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11695/) (2025)
- [The Geometry of LLM Quantization: GPTQ as Babai's Nearest Plane Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18553/) (2025)
- [Provable Post-Training Quantization: Theoretical Analysis of OPTQ and Qronos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.04853/) (2025)
- [The Lattice Geometry of Neural Network Quantization -- A Short Equivalence Proof of GPTQ and Babai's Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01077/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large neural networks can be compressed by rounding or "quantizing" their weights to numbers that admit representations with fewer bits. One algorithm for quantization, OPTQ, progressively quantizes the weights of a neural network so that the squared quantization error on a specified calibration dataset is as small as possible. We study the performance of OPTQ and a variant algorithm, stochastic OPTQ, in a generalization setting and derive bounds for the expected squared error accrued by the algorithm when a test point is drawn from a fixed distribution. We prove two results. One result relates the generalization error to the error on a calibration dataset comprising independent samples from the same distribution as the test distribution. The other result bounds the generalization error of stochastic OPTQ for all sufficiently nice distributions, regardless of the calibration dataset. In both of these results, the regularization term λ plays an important role. We use insights from these results to make a new recommendation for the choice of λ and see that this choice of λ preforms favorably in experiments when compared to prior recommendations in the literature.