# FAVoR: Measuring and Mitigating Author-Style Homogenization in Federated Personalized Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30968 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.30968/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10957/) (2020)
- [Hierarchical Neural Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04833/) (2018)
- [Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.04221/) (2020)
- [Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau Envelopes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.08848/) (2020)
- [Dear Sir or Madam, May I introduce the GYAFC Dataset: Corpus, Benchmarks and Metrics for Formality Style Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06535/) (2018)
- [Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05196/) (2023)
- [FLoRA: Federated Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Heterogeneous Low-Rank Adaptations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05976/) (2024)
- [Federated Fine-tuning of Large Language Models under Heterogeneous Tasks and Client Resources](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11505/) (2024)
- [FedNLP: Benchmarking Federated Learning Methods for Natural Language Processing Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08815/) (2021)
- [AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11360/) (2024)
- [FDLoRA: Personalized Federated Learning of Large Language Model via Dual LoRA Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07925/) (2024)
- [Dual-Personalizing Adapter for Federated Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19211/) (2024)
- [StyleDistance: Stronger Content-Independent Style Embeddings with Synthetic Parallel Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12757/) (2024)
- [Whose story is it? Personalizing story generation by inferring author styles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13028/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are increasingly used as personalized writing assistants, but adapting a model across many authors can compromise individual writing style by pulling author-specific signals toward a shared register. Federated parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) offers a data-local setting for this multi-author adaptation problem: clients keep author text local while sharing compact adapter updates. However, we show that standard aggregation can preserve continuation utility while making different authors' generations less distinguishable in style space, a failure mode we define as author-style homogenization. We evaluate author-style retention with Angular Style Classification Encoder (ASCE)-based diagnostics on our main BlogText benchmark and ASCE-independent external authorship verification. Using this protocol, we find that common federated PEFT baselines can preserve semantic utility while averaging out author-specific signals. To address this homogenization, we instantiate FAVoR (Federated Authorial Voice Retention), an author-style residual mechanism for federated PEFT. FAVoR uses a shared-private adapter design: clients upload shared-adapter updates while retaining author-specific residual corrections locally. Across BlogText and external Mythos-Reddit validation, FAVoR improves author-style retention over standard and personalized federated PEFT baselines. These gains come with small continuation-utility trade-offs and are supported by component ablations, external verification, and cold-start transfer.
