# When Identical Rows Disagree: From Benchmark Identifiability to Replication-Robust Anomaly Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29580 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29580/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.09426/) (2022)
- [PyOD: A Python Toolbox for Scalable Outlier Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.01588/) (2019)
- [Deep Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.06602/) (2022)
- [A Closer Look at AUROC and AUPRC under Class Imbalance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06091/) (2024)
- [TabReD: Analyzing Pitfalls and Filling the Gaps in Tabular Deep Learning Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19380/) (2024)
- [Unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms on real-world data: how many do we need?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00735/) (2023)
- [Beyond Individual Input for Deep Anomaly Detection on Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15121/) (2023)
- [Derandomized Novelty Detection with FDR Control via Conformal E-values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07294/) (2023)
- [Robust Conformal Outlier Detection under Contaminated Reference Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04807/) (2025)
- [FoMo-0D: A Foundation Model for Zero-shot Tabular Outlier Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05672/) (2024)
- [Tabular Foundation Models are Strong Graph Anomaly Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.17301/) (2026)
- [From Zero to Hero: Advancing Zero-Shot Foundation Models for Tabular Outlier Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03018/) (2026)
- [Intrinsic Self-Supervision for Data Quality Audits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17048/) (2023)
- [Anomaly Detection with Variance Stabilized Density Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00582/) (2023)
- [Invariant Anomaly Detection under Distribution Shifts: A Causal Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14329/) (2023)
- [MacrOData: New Benchmarks of Thousands of Datasets for Tabular Outlier Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09329/) (2026)
- [EventADL: Open-Box Anomaly Detection and Localization Framework for Events in Cloud-Based Service Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00936/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A released table is often treated as an i.i.d. sample, although its repeated rows may encode business frequency, repeated entities, joins, resampling, or extraction errors. We show that this ambiguity creates a hidden measurement layer with three consequences: feature-identical rows impose an attained evaluation ceiling, row-weighted AUROC is sensitive to replication, and row-trained detectors learn a multiplicity-size-biased law. An exact-row audit of all 690 OddBench datasets finds train-test overlap in 355, feature-identical label conflict in 147, and a test anomaly identical to a training normal in 137. Switching from row to support weighting changes AUROC by at least 0.05 on 50-61 datasets across four classical detector geometries. We introduce SCOUT (Support-Count Orthogonalized Unsupervised Testing), a factorized anomaly detector that separates replication-invariant support evidence from exposure-aware count evidence. Factorwise split-conformal calibration yields marginal false-positive-rate control, while the support channel is exactly invariant to arbitrary positive row replication. On 686 OddBench datasets and five seeds, support-only SCOUT is non-inferior to row-wise Isolation Forest in raw AUROC and improves replication-invariant AUROC. External normal-support evaluations track nominal false-positive levels, and four backbones remain exactly unchanged under controlled replication. Semi-synthetic interventions show that conditional count modeling helps materially only under strong rate heterogeneity. These results specify when multiplicity should be treated as signal, nuisance, or uninterpretable without additional information.
