# DocuTeam: Mixed-Initiative Multi-Agent Discussions around Evolving Documents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29309 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29309/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 35 of its 99 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19118/) (2023)
- [Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04468/) (2024)
- [A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14117/) (2024)
- [LLM Discussion: Enhancing the Creativity of Large Language Models via Discussion Framework and Role-Play](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06373/) (2024)
- [Creating General User Models from Computer Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10831/) (2025)
- [IdeaSynth: Iterative Research Idea Development Through Evolving and Composing Idea Facets with Literature-Grounded Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04025/) (2024)
- [Need Help? Designing Proactive AI Assistants for Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04596/) (2024)
- [Proactive Conversational Agents with Inner Thoughts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00383/) (2024)
- [Beyond the Chat: Executable and Verifiable Text-Editing with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15337/) (2023)
- [Assistance or Disruption? Exploring and Evaluating the Design and Trade-offs of Proactive AI Programming Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18658/) (2025)
- [Debate-to-Write: A Persona-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Diverse Argument Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19643/) (2024)
- [Synergi: A Mixed-Initiative System for Scholarly Synthesis and Sensemaking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07517/) (2023)
- [ChoiceMates: Supporting Unfamiliar Online Decision-Making with Multi-Agent Conversational Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01331/) (2023)
- [MATEval: A Multi-Agent Discussion Framework for Advancing Open-Ended Text Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19305/) (2024)
- [Proxona: Supporting Creators' Sensemaking and Ideation with LLM-Powered Audience Personas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.10937/) (2024)
- [PersonaFlow: Designing LLM-Simulated Expert Perspectives for Enhanced Research Ideation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12538/) (2024)
- [Multi-Agents are Social Groups: Investigating Social Influence of Multiple Agents in Human-Agent Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04578/) (2024)
- [Argumentative Experience: Reducing Confirmation Bias on Controversial Issues through LLM-Generated Multi-Persona Debates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04629/) (2024)
- [Sensible Agent: A Framework for Unobtrusive Interaction with Proactive AR Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.09255/) (2025)
- [Competent but Rigid: Identifying the Gap in Empowering AI to Participate Equally in Group Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08807/) (2023)
- [AgentInit: Initializing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems via Diversity and Expertise Orchestration for Effective and Efficient Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19236/) (2025)
- [Exploring a Behavioral Model of "Positive Friction" in Human-AI Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09683/) (2024)
- [From Conversation to Orchestration: HCI Challenges and Opportunities in Interactive Multi-Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20091/) (2025)
- [Just-In-Time Objectives: A General Approach for Specialized AI Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14591/) (2025)
- [PaperDebugger: A Plugin-Based Multi-Agent System for In-Editor Academic Writing, Review, and Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02589/) (2025)
- [Collaborative Document Editing with Multiple Users and AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11826/) (2025)
- [ClearFairy: Capturing Creative Workflows through Decision Structuring, In-Situ Questioning, and Rationale Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.14537/) (2025)
- [Perspectra: Choosing Your Experts Enhances Critical Thinking in Multi-Agent Research Ideation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20553/) (2025)
- [MeetMap: Real-Time Collaborative Dialogue Mapping with LLMs in Online Meetings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01564/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In open-ended problem solving, collaborators often rely on discussion to surface concerns, challenge perspectives, and refine shared work as it evolves. While AI agents are increasingly used as discussion partners, existing multi-agent systems place a heavy burden on users to initiate and carefully orchestrate the discussions. We present DocuTeam, a mixed-initiative multi-agent discussion system in which both users and agents can initiate and steer conversations. Agents monitor document changes to proactively start and redirect discussions as the work evolves, while users can flexibly shape the conversation or adopt agent ideas. In a within-subjects study (N=20), participants using DocuTeam produced outcomes rated significantly more novel, relevant, and specific than with a baseline without any increase in cognitive load. Rather than using agents for one-off idea sourcing, participants engaged in an iterative refinement loop in which document changes prompted agent reactions, which led users to revisit and further develop their work.