# Scope Before You Persist: Preventing Cross-Family Interference in Agent Memory

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29144 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29144/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent skill learning and evolution, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 20 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent skill learning and evolution](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-skill-learning-and-evolution/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14465/) (2022)
- [Self-Rewarding Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10020/) (2024)
- [BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15877/) (2024)
- [Automated Design of Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08435/) (2024)
- [Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22954/) (2025)
- [Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06585/) (2023)
- [Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19594/) (2024)
- [Can Large Reasoning Models Self-Train?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21444/) (2025)
- [G"odel Agent: A Self-Referential Agent Framework for Recursive Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04444/) (2024)
- [Spontaneous Reward Hacking in Iterative Self-Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04549/) (2024)
- [MetaSkill-Evolve: Recursive Self-Improvement of LLM Agents via Two-Timescale Meta-Skill Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.05297/) (2026)
- [The Red Queen G"odel Machine: Co-Evolving Agents and Their Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26294/) (2026)
- [Do Agent Optimizers Compound? A Continual-Learning Evaluation on Terminal-Bench 2.0](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14004/) (2026)
- [Collapse of Self-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02305/) (2024)
- [Mendel G"odel Machine: Recursive Self-Improving Coding Agents via Comparative Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07645/) (2026)
- [Memory Reward Inflation in Self-Improving LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00017/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Persistent memory lets language-model agents improve prompts and skills without updating model weights. We show that matching retrieval scope to certification scope enables these edits to support reliable repeated adaptation across recurring task families. We study frozen-model agents on ProcStream-RSI, a 12-round code-repair stream, using Orthogonal Regression Control (ORC), an execution-grounded gate for persistent skill edits. In an intervention that holds proposals and gate decisions fixed, retrieving each accepted skill only for its originating family raises mean hidden trajectory utility from 0.713 under global memory to 0.816 and changes harmful deployments from six of eight to none. In 27 paired randomized-order streams, Scoped-ORC improves mean trajectory utility by 0.063 [0.037, 0.094] over Global-ORC, accepts 63 rather than 12 updates, and produces multiple accepted updates in 19/27 streams, with 0/63 harmful acceptances. The global control reaches 0.713, below the static agent's 0.775, because locally valid edits can interfere with unrelated families. These results establish scope matching as a complementary control for persistent agent memory: certification determines whether an edit is supported, while retrieval scope determines where that evidence authorizes its use.