# Thinking Leakage: A Causal Audit of NoThink Post-Training in Hybrid Reasoning Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28682 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.28682/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Causal reasoning in LLMs, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 19 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Causal reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/lr/causal-reasoning-in-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02556/) (2025)
- [The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06824/) (2023)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21509/) (2025)
- [OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04178/) (2025)
- [Learning beyond Teacher: Generalized On-Policy Distillation with Reward Extrapolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12125/) (2026)
- [Understanding Reasoning in Thinking Language Models via Steering Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18167/) (2025)
- [MiniCPM4: Ultra-Efficient LLMs on End Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07900/) (2025)
- [Nemotron 3 Nano Omni: Efficient and Open Multimodal Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.24954/) (2026)
- [On-Policy Self-Distillation without Any Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06296/) (2026)
- [EasySteer: A Unified Framework for High-Performance and Extensible LLM Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25175/) (2025)
- [Does On-Policy Distillation Really Distill? From Noisy Teacher to Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.31046/) (2026)
- [Bootstrapping Exploration with Group-Level Natural Language Feedback in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.04597/) (2026)
- [AGPO: Asymmetric Group Policy Optimization for Verifiable Reasoning and Search Ads Relevance at JD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05826/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Post-training hybrid reasoning models in NoThink mode has attracted growing interest as a way to improve performance while keeping inference fast. However, these gains may draw on thinking behavior already accessible through the base model's Think mode. We formulate this thinking leakage in a causal mediation framework and audit its contribution using bidirectional interventions along a simple base-derived activation direction. Across three models and three post-training methods on competition math benchmarks, we find that leakage is real, causal, and substantial: behavioral and representational analyses reveal shifts toward Think, steering the base model along this direction reproduces most of the post-training accuracy gain, and counter-steering a checkpoint removes a substantial share of what it gains. Across nine aligned checkpoints with positive NoThink gains, the resulting leakage ratio ranges from 42% to 79%. These interventions support a substantial causal contribution of thinking leakage. Our findings show that a post-training method's apparent advantage can therefore reflect greater drift toward Think, obscuring whether it improves capability within NoThink or more effectively re-invokes existing Think behavior.
