# Does DCGAN-Based Synthetic Augmentation Improve Brain Tumor MRI Classification? An Empirical Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28508 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.28508/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04958/) (2019)
- [Improved Techniques for Training GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03498/) (2016)
- [Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00028/) (2017)
- [Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06434/) (2015)
- [High-Resolution Swin Transformer for Automatic Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.11553/) (2022)
- [Do Synthetic Brain MRIs Reliably Improve Tumour Classification? A StyleGAN2-ADA Class-Plane Augmentation Study on BRISC 2025](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23094/) (2026)
- [Improving Medical Image Generative Models with Fr'echet Distance Loss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.13300/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are increasingly used to augment medical imaging datasets, but synthetic images do not necessarily provide downstream classification benefits. This study investigates whether class-specific Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network (DCGAN) augmentation improves brain tumor classification when the classifier and evaluation set are held constant. Experiments were conducted on 7,200 brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans across four classes: glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, and no tumor. For each class, 1,400 real images were used for training and 400 were reserved for testing. A baseline Swin Transformer classifier was trained using only the real training images and compared with a second model trained using the same real images augmented with 500 DCGAN-generated images per class. Both conditions were evaluated on the identical held-out test set. The two models achieved the same overall accuracy of 96%, while macro F1 remained effectively unchanged and ROC-AUC decreased slightly from 0.987 to 0.982 after augmentation. Class-level analysis showed small redistributions in errors rather than a consistent performance gain. FID values between real and synthetic images ranged from 209.15 to 314.27, indicating substantial distributional differences under the adopted evaluation setup. These results suggest that synthetic augmentation should not be assumed to improve medical image classification and should instead be evaluated for both distributional fidelity and downstream task utility.