# Groundbench: Multi-Resolution Polygon Grounding Exposes the Geometry Gap in Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27821 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27821/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 38 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10811/) (2019)
- [Kosmos-2: Grounding Multimodal Large Language Models to the World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14824/) (2023)
- [Modeling Context in Referring Expressions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.00272/) (2016)
- [Shikra: Unleashing Multimodal LLM's Referential Dialogue Magic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15195/) (2023)
- [Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02283/) (2015)
- [MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12763/) (2021)
- [LISA: Reasoning Segmentation via Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00692/) (2023)
- [Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06209/) (2024)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [Ferret: Refer and Ground Anything Anywhere at Any Granularity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07704/) (2023)
- [VisionLLM: Large Language Model is also an Open-Ended Decoder for Vision-Centric Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11175/) (2023)
- [GLaMM: Pixel Grounding Large Multimodal Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03356/) (2023)
- [Pix2seq: A Language Modeling Framework for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10852/) (2021)
- [Are we done with ImageNet?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07159/) (2020)
- [Visual Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00363/) (2022)
- [GRES: Generalized Referring Expression Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00968/) (2023)
- [PolyFormer: Referring Image Segmentation as Sequential Polygon Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07387/) (2023)
- [SeqTR: A Simple yet Universal Network for Visual Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16265/) (2022)
- [Efficient Interactive Annotation of Segmentation Datasets with Polygon-RNN++](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09693/) (2018)
- [PhraseCut: Language-based Image Segmentation in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.01187/) (2020)
- [Deep Snake for Real-Time Instance Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.01629/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Bounding-box scores on RefCOCO-family grounding leave little room to distinguish frontier vision-language systems, yet boxes discard object shape. We introduce GroundingBench, a matched benchmark that re-targets the same 1,500 image-expression-referent triples to exact-N polygons at five vertex budgets. A fixed-denominator harness separately audits filled-region intersection over union (IoU) and legal-polygon completion. The strongest tested configuration reaches 88.2 box IoU and 97.1 accuracy at IoU >= .5 (Acc@.5), versus 57.7 and 69.2 for direct polygons; because these headline scores use different references, we also compare direct polygons with predicted boxes rasterised against the same contour target, obtaining 57.7 versus 57.3 when pooled. Performance is non-monotone in N and collapses at the densest budget, where legality failures compound residual geometric error. Qwen's thinking-setting contrast is the largest tested input-preserving configuration difference; under frozen templates, false spatial cues are more damaging than false colour cues, and target preference can remain high while contour tracing is poor. Alternate masks and a continuous-area scorer preserve the principal ordering. GroundingBench therefore measures an operational output-geometry gap spanning localisation, boundary construction, serialisation, and topology, rather than latent boundary perception alone.
