# PRISM-VLM: A Multi-Axis Discriminative Benchmark for Compact Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27395 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27395/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00398/) (2020)
- [OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00067/) (2019)
- [Modeling Context in Referring Expressions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.00272/) (2016)
- [Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13548/) (2023)
- [Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02283/) (2015)
- [A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.07396/) (2016)
- [LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13076/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10302/) (2024)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02813/) (2024)
- [A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00491/) (2018)
- [SmolVLM: Redefining small and efficient multimodal models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05299/) (2025)
- [MANTIS: Interleaved Multi-Image Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01483/) (2024)
- [Teaching CLIP to Count to Ten](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12066/) (2023)
- [Sycophancy in Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Analysis and an Inference-Time Mitigation Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11261/) (2024)
- [Have the VLMs Lost Confidence? A Study of Sycophancy in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11302/) (2024)
- [KRETA: A Benchmark for Korean Reading and Reasoning in Text-Rich VQA Attuned to Diverse Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.19944/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Compact vision-language models (VLMs) now power a growing share of multimodal applications. The benchmarks used to compare them, however, inherit a frontier-centric design: each model is reduced to a single accuracy number, narrowing the inter-model gap on saturated suites and pressing models into low-score bands on harder ones. We introduce PRISM-VLM, a multi-axis discriminative benchmark that scores every item along seven axes covering the recurring failure modes (task quality, behavioral robustness, and capability bottlenecks) and combines them into a single PScore, with items recycled from fifteen public benchmarks. Across compact VLMs from the past two years, PScore separates model pairs more reliably than prior single-axis benchmarks under an item-level paired bootstrap, and surfaces behavioral differences these benchmarks average away. Even models with statistically indistinguishable PScores diverge sharply along the per-axis profile, particularly on sycophancy, which is nearly orthogonal to single-prompt accuracy. We will release the full pipeline, prompts, and per-item annotations.